I know the rivals and scout rankings don't mean much in the entire scheme of things and it's how the kids perform once they get to college but how can there be that big of a difference in team rankings from site-to-site The Bucks are currently @ 6 in one and 14 in the other? According to Scout, the Bucks have 8 players in the top 100 verbally committed, which is more than any other team (Okla also has 8). You would think there would be a much higher point emphasis on getting the best of the best. Rivals puts more of an emphasis on quality of players rather than pure numbers. Look @ A&M up there @ #4 with 28 committs and the majority being 3 stars and no 5 stars. Seems to me, as an example: class of 15 of 4-5 5 stars and the rest of the majority made up of 4 stars is better than 20+ and a few 4's and mainly 3's. Regardless, the Bucks have a great class coming in. Already anxiously awaiting the Spring Game next year.
