View Single Post
  #311 (permalink)  
Old 02-07-2008, 12:55 AM
BengalsAndBucks's Avatar
BengalsAndBucks BengalsAndBucks is offline
Heisman
 
BP Donor
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 763
Points: 152.10
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 152.10
BengalsAndBucks is TresselesqueBengalsAndBucks is TresselesqueBengalsAndBucks is Tresselesque
BengalsAndBucks is TresselesqueBengalsAndBucks is TresselesqueBengalsAndBucks is TresselesqueBengalsAndBucks is TresselesqueBengalsAndBucks is TresselesqueBengalsAndBucks is TresselesqueBengalsAndBucks is TresselesqueBengalsAndBucks is TresselesqueBengalsAndBucks is TresselesqueBengalsAndBucks is TresselesqueBengalsAndBucks is TresselesqueBengalsAndBucks is TresselesqueBengalsAndBucks is TresselesqueBengalsAndBucks is TresselesqueBengalsAndBucks is TresselesqueBengalsAndBucks is TresselesqueBengalsAndBucks is TresselesqueBengalsAndBucks is TresselesqueBengalsAndBucks is TresselesqueBengalsAndBucks is TresselesqueBengalsAndBucks is Tresselesque
I just don't really feel like there is a way to allow this without opening the flood gates. You allow a player to transfer because of a coaching change with a new system, next players start following coaches to new schools without consequence. Really feel for Mallett in the situation, because he is the one getting screwed, but I don't see how they would grant this one.
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.07545 seconds with 9 queries