Thread: 2008 NBA Draft
View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2008, 04:11 PM
exhawg's Avatar
exhawg exhawg is offline
Legendary
Moderator
 
Cleveland Indians Cleveland Cavaliers Cleveland Browns Ohio State

Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,208
Points: 1,001,072.63
Bank: 27,984.65
Total Points: 1,029,057.28
exhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesque
exhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesque
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piney View Post
I think our targets are a bit wider than that. While a young PG is nice, I think we take the best available amongst C, PF or PG. I know we are set right now with 4 nice bigs but only Andy is young and who knows if he wants to stay because the type of deal he signed allows him to leave in 2 years.

So if there is a long athletic rebounder type available I would grab him with our first. Then he can sit on the bench for a year to learn. Cuz it seems like in the mock drafts I have seen the PGs are taken early while there are some decent PF types available late in the first round.
I guess I have to change my mindset that the Cavs have good young bigs because they no longer do. I thought they were pretty well set with Andy, Gooden, and Simmons, but that isn't the case anymore. I think they will do what it takes to resign Andy now that they have to, but they will need another good big in the next few years.
__________________

God hates Michigan
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.10233 seconds with 9 queries