View Single Post
  #172 (permalink)  
Old 03-03-2008, 01:46 AM
billmac91's Avatar
billmac91 billmac91 is offline
Hall of Fame
 
BP Donor

Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 2,340
Points: 375,774.43
Bank: 7,258.26
Total Points: 383,032.69
billmac91 is Tresselesquebillmac91 is Tresselesquebillmac91 is Tresselesquebillmac91 is Tresselesquebillmac91 is Tresselesque
billmac91 is Tresselesquebillmac91 is Tresselesquebillmac91 is Tresselesquebillmac91 is Tresselesquebillmac91 is Tresselesquebillmac91 is Tresselesquebillmac91 is Tresselesquebillmac91 is Tresselesquebillmac91 is Tresselesquebillmac91 is Tresselesquebillmac91 is Tresselesquebillmac91 is Tresselesquebillmac91 is Tresselesquebillmac91 is Tresselesquebillmac91 is Tresselesquebillmac91 is Tresselesque
Quote:
Originally Posted by WoodyWorshiper View Post
First off, I'd like to say that you have a really classy way of making your points, billmac. Agree that right now, on paper, the secondary is thin. But adding to the DL the way Phil has done immediately makes the guys that we do have alot better. Obviously, you're a great fan. Have confidence in the guys running the show. That's the excuse I've always used, but in the Browns case, I think it's a good one.

Peace.
Thanks dubs. I definately agree, the incoming DLineman automatically make the guys we do have better. Unfortunately, we're a starting CB short of going from what's on paper an average/good defense to a good/great defense.

Gotta give Phil credit for what he's done so far though. I'm making an assumption, but after the last couple years I'd be willing to bet Phil thinks it's a lot harder tp get good DLineman for our defense as opposed to CB's. Kind of like in the Patriots system where they seem to have a revolving door in the secondary. It all starts up front. That being said, we still need to add one more piece to the secondary.
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.13986 seconds with 9 queries