View Single Post
  #74 (permalink)  
Old 04-16-2008, 12:33 PM
OH10 OH10 is offline
*
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,575
Points: 1,489.55
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 1,489.55
OH10 is a revered BP posterOH10 is a revered BP posterOH10 is a revered BP posterOH10 is a revered BP posterOH10 is a revered BP posterOH10 is a revered BP posterOH10 is a revered BP poster
OH10 is a revered BP posterOH10 is a revered BP posterOH10 is a revered BP posterOH10 is a revered BP posterOH10 is a revered BP posterOH10 is a revered BP posterOH10 is a revered BP posterOH10 is a revered BP posterOH10 is a revered BP posterOH10 is a revered BP posterOH10 is a revered BP posterOH10 is a revered BP posterOH10 is a revered BP posterOH10 is a revered BP posterOH10 is a revered BP posterOH10 is a revered BP posterOH10 is a revered BP posterOH10 is a revered BP posterOH10 is a revered BP posterOH10 is a revered BP posterOH10 is a revered BP posterOH10 is a revered BP poster
If the NBA agrees to raise the rookie cap to account for the potential lost year in salary, I fail to see how they could not make this work with everyone... including the player's union.

It really is a win-win.

Quote:
I just keep imagining how much it would have hurt to hold Lebron down for two years.
Completely disagree. There's no reason to believe that Lebron would not be as dominant, if not a more complete player, than he is right now were he to have gone to college for two years. And if the NBA would agree to raise the rookie cap, that would account for lost salary in most situations. (Lebron's may be the one and only exception because of his ridiculous endorsements).
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.07800 seconds with 9 queries