Quote:
Originally Posted by MililaniBuckeye
Uh, why do we need six DBs? In 2009 (after the four current senior DB depart), we'll still have at least 15-16 DBs (Moeller keeps bouncing from DB to LB), counting the two 2009 commits we have (Barnett and Wood). You may argue that five will be seniors in 2009, but even if we take only 4 for 2009 we'll have 12-13 DBs for 2010 and that's before we take any DBs from the 2010 recruiting class. Four DBs in this class would be more than sufficient.
|
Well some of the depth on the roster ain't quite getting the job done and we only took 2 last year in Howard and Domicone...And we play many 5 db sets, and at time 6 and they play alot of special teams as well...With losing 4 this year and 5 next year that is 9 in two year span...We brough in 2 last year, and 6 this year makes 8...Then we bring in maybe 3 in 10...
Moeller is getting the first look at LB right now with Terry playing some fullback...His safety experiment didn't work out...
What about Washington, O'neal, Clifford...What is going on with them...
Also the guys we are in on are top tier guys, and a couple of them could get look at WR...They can double as WR, DB, S...Torrence is getting a look at DB this offseason from lack of depth, when many have said he is having a great spring at WR...
And you find room for guys like McGee, Hall, Hunter, Vlad...We could obviously go with 5 or 4, but it looks like with the wide net cast the staff wants about 6...