View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 11:16 AM
t_BuckeyeScott's Avatar
t_BuckeyeScott t_BuckeyeScott is offline
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 1,788
Points: 142.55
Bank: 0.29
Total Points: 142.84
t_BuckeyeScott is Tresselesquet_BuckeyeScott is Tresselesquet_BuckeyeScott is Tresselesque
t_BuckeyeScott is Tresselesquet_BuckeyeScott is Tresselesquet_BuckeyeScott is Tresselesquet_BuckeyeScott is Tresselesquet_BuckeyeScott is Tresselesquet_BuckeyeScott is Tresselesquet_BuckeyeScott is Tresselesquet_BuckeyeScott is Tresselesquet_BuckeyeScott is Tresselesquet_BuckeyeScott is Tresselesquet_BuckeyeScott is Tresselesquet_BuckeyeScott is Tresselesquet_BuckeyeScott is Tresselesquet_BuckeyeScott is Tresselesquet_BuckeyeScott is Tresselesquet_BuckeyeScott is Tresselesquet_BuckeyeScott is Tresselesquet_BuckeyeScott is Tresselesquet_BuckeyeScott is Tresselesquet_BuckeyeScott is Tresselesquet_BuckeyeScott is Tresselesque
Quote:
Originally Posted by cincibuck
The reason for the contract going to the Raptor was not performance based. It had to do with contracts the other company already had on its plate.

Think of it in the same way the SAW and the M-16 got into the Army inventory; chosen for the wrong damn reasons.
Don't necessarily disagree fully, but I don't think its as bad as you say. The Raptor is one bad-ass jet.
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.09377 seconds with 9 queries