Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve19
I'm not a lawyer, except in certain other personalities, in which case I am but cannot remember in this personality.
So, my question is this.
If RR and his wife and attorneys are in a room and they have a discussion about avoiding the $4 million payment. If he denies it, she denies it, and the attorneys claim privilege, who is going to reveal it. So, if that discussion did take place, how would WVU prove it?
|
The questioning about UM agreeing to pay RR's $4 million WVU buy out centered around a redacted portion of the term sheet that RR signed with the UM. RR's attorney would not permit RR to answer any questions concerning the redacted portion of the UM term sheet. The attorney also prevented RR from testifying on anything that was said while Rita was in the room on the grounds that Rita was working as his agent on the case. The judge will decide a motion to compel testimony, and in that motion will be a request to compel disclosure of the redacted portion of the term sheet. If either RR or Rita claim no knowledge about UM's agreement to pay the WVU buy out amount, both will look at best like two fools and at worst will border on perjury.