View Single Post
  #199 (permalink)  
Old 06-06-2008, 11:09 PM
B-town Buckeye's Avatar
B-town Buckeye B-town Buckeye is offline
late to the party
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 110
Points: 1,043.66
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 1,043.66
B-town Buckeye made the starting lineupB-town Buckeye made the starting lineupB-town Buckeye made the starting lineupB-town Buckeye made the starting lineupB-town Buckeye made the starting lineupB-town Buckeye made the starting lineupB-town Buckeye made the starting lineupB-town Buckeye made the starting lineupB-town Buckeye made the starting lineupB-town Buckeye made the starting lineupB-town Buckeye made the starting lineupB-town Buckeye made the starting lineupB-town Buckeye made the starting lineupB-town Buckeye made the starting lineupB-town Buckeye made the starting lineupB-town Buckeye made the starting lineupB-town Buckeye made the starting lineupB-town Buckeye made the starting lineupB-town Buckeye made the starting lineupB-town Buckeye made the starting lineupB-town Buckeye made the starting lineupB-town Buckeye made the starting lineup
my calculator is not happy with me either lol...


...for the record, my point wasn't to try to say there should necessarily be more Ohio guys...just more to point out exactly how different ESPN/Scouts Inc. is seeing the recruiting world in comparison to their counterparts.

Going in, I expected somewhere between the scout and rivals numbers for the SEC/B10 state comparison (roughly 2-to-1)...but the ESPN/Scouts Inc. numbers (roughly 4 to 1)...just seem way out of whack to me.
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.15743 seconds with 9 queries