I never saw anybody say they weren't happy with our recruits anywhere (I'm assuming I'm included as well)? All I see is a debate on the rankings and assessing what Lugintool said. I'm happy with this entire class and whoever JT offers. The staff always has their reasons and they are better than my own. I am in no way complaining, as the talent and competitors in this class is sick. All I was debating is that a recruiting service can't rate all of our guys at 4 and 5 stars, and in the top 100 or so. Other teams get good talent as well and there are many good players out there across the country. I don't know how that is so hard for some to accept. Even if other teams do indeed get better talent, I think we develop it better or as good as any other team in the country.
Btw, if you don't care about the rankings, why do you pay any attention to them? Your not excited when we land a 5 star or top 100 guy? Rankings aren't the end all, and are nothing near 100%, but they usually give a good barometer on talent. They are fun to debate and assess, and add to the run in following recruiting. They will hit and miss but that is the fun in it. I guess you are a selective reader if you missed me saying:
"With all that said, I still think we are going to end up with the #2 class in the country, only behind USC. Also keep in mind that is just right now, before our staff makes some diamonds from the rough. I really like this class so far with it's of speed and athleticism, size, and players from winning teams that are warriors on the field."
"Fields, Klein, and Whiting are all top 100 guys...not having them on that list is ridiculous. ESPin has their own agenda and will always rank our guys low, and they are idiots. For once, Luginbill made a couple semi-valid points, but he is still a tool."
"Now don't take this post as "these guys aren't
OSU material" and as a disclaimer, I "trust the coaches." However, we have to view this as objectively as possible."