View Single Post
  #1524 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2008, 06:46 PM
SEREbuckeye's Avatar
SEREbuckeye SEREbuckeye is offline
Ramblers, lets get ramblin'
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 727
Points: 712.71
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 712.71
SEREbuckeye is TresselesqueSEREbuckeye is TresselesqueSEREbuckeye is TresselesqueSEREbuckeye is TresselesqueSEREbuckeye is Tresselesque
SEREbuckeye is TresselesqueSEREbuckeye is TresselesqueSEREbuckeye is TresselesqueSEREbuckeye is TresselesqueSEREbuckeye is TresselesqueSEREbuckeye is TresselesqueSEREbuckeye is TresselesqueSEREbuckeye is TresselesqueSEREbuckeye is TresselesqueSEREbuckeye is TresselesqueSEREbuckeye is TresselesqueSEREbuckeye is TresselesqueSEREbuckeye is TresselesqueSEREbuckeye is TresselesqueSEREbuckeye is TresselesqueSEREbuckeye is TresselesqueSEREbuckeye is TresselesqueSEREbuckeye is TresselesqueSEREbuckeye is TresselesqueSEREbuckeye is TresselesqueSEREbuckeye is TresselesqueSEREbuckeye is Tresselesque
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oh8ch View Post
Exactly.

I have heard some suggest that JT has to do things like this because the program looks bad if he doesn't look tough. If that is really what happened - if he really put that sort of consideration ahead of what was fair to the kid - I would be very disappointed.
I guess thats why when coaches are hired, it takes some time to figure out who can best run a program. It JT's case, he must decide how to view on a case-by-case basis, but at the same time be equal across the board. Then when it comes to punishment, he had to figure out what was best for his team, the player and the reputation of his school. Then take into the account that he probably had a close relationship with Henton (as he does will all his qb's) and it gets more foggy for his decisions.

I certainly wouldn't want to be in JT's cleats when it comes to punishment.
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.12809 seconds with 9 queries