Quote:
Originally Posted by troy#1
Not really. Since you like stats so much, take into account OOC teams each conference played. There ya go! Looks like all these stats dont mean squat! Quality opponents ooc versus non quality. Bottom line, slice it how you like, stats can be, and alot of times are misleading. I read all over how sec teams beef up there stats playing weak ooc teams. Start slicing!  |
Quality OOC opponents like Idaho (1-11), Notre Dame (3-9), and Nebraska (5-7)? You really need to start putting some thought into your posts. The last few have just been asinine.
Big ten has no offenses...Now they're offenses are only good because the defenses suck...Now the stats don't mean anything, because the OOC games aren't separated...Blah, blah, blah. You're the one who started the stats discussion, and likes to talk about how they don't mean what they say; yet you have yet to provide stats yourself, and seem to have a real problem with comprehending them. You can wish that stats support your arguments and then discount them when they don't all you like. That doesn't change the fact that stats are the only concrete support you can use in a sports discussion, that's why coaches use them. If you continue to make a ridiculous ammount of posts that are completely devoid of substance, I'm going to request that the mods create a separate thread for the "children's discussion", so those of us who like to have intelligent conversations don't have to read them at the "adult table". Don't whine about how people are being mean to you. You are bringing it on yourself by posting all this "Pac-10 rules, Big Ten sucks..cause I said so" bull[censored].