02-01-2005, 08:43 PM
|
 |
blissfully stupid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,731
Points: 3,509,334.70
Bank: 1,560.73
Total Points: 3,510,895.42
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LightningRod
That argument was presented in the defense motion for acquittal. These arguments are made outside of the presence of the jury. The attorney is not admitting that his client paid the high school coach. What he is arguing is that there is a violation of substantive due process because assuming that a payment was made, there was no law prohibiting the activity at the time the alleged payment was made. My guess is that the booster is found guilty.
|
aha! i didn't realize there would be no jury to hear it. nevermind says me. |