Quote:
Originally Posted by zwem
Yeah, brand name had something to do it with it just like any other big time college football program. They went 11-2 the previous year and had a lot of their starters coming back. That is why they were ranked high. The 2006 season was just a smoke screen and Michigan wasn't really that good.
|
Long, Henne and Bikey? Manningham and Arrington? That team was too good offensively to play as bad as they did early on. There was plenty of talent on defense, they were just poorly coached and conditioned.