View Single Post
  #592 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2009, 06:21 PM
zwem's Avatar
zwem zwem is offline
Hail To The Victors
 
BP Donor
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 187
Points: 195,007.48
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 195,007.48
zwem is Tresselesquezwem is Tresselesquezwem is Tresselesquezwem is Tresselesquezwem is Tresselesque
zwem is Tresselesquezwem is Tresselesquezwem is Tresselesquezwem is Tresselesquezwem is Tresselesquezwem is Tresselesquezwem is Tresselesquezwem is Tresselesquezwem is Tresselesquezwem is Tresselesquezwem is Tresselesquezwem is Tresselesquezwem is Tresselesquezwem is Tresselesquezwem is Tresselesque
Quote:
Originally Posted by NFBuck View Post
That's what they do. Most of us have no problem owning up to our deficiencies the past couple of years (UF, LSU games in particular). m*ch*g*n fans rewrite history and claim they had no expectations anyway. Going into last year, a large majority of them were expecting anywhere from 7-10 wins. Of course most of them deny that now.

I actually had Michigan winning 5-6 games last year and the 2007 team winning 11 and going to a BCS bowl game. Both of those seasons were disappointments but it was very nice to see Michigan and Carr beat Florida.

The 2006 team was ranked #15 in the preseason. They lost their two biggest games of the year. They had to hang on to beat Ball State when they had the ball in the redzone. Michigan's biggest wins that year were probably ND and Wisconsin. ND had 10 wins but we all know what happened when they played USC and LSU. I think Michigan only beat one ranked team that year. Expectations weren't as high on the 2006 team as previous seasons.

I think Michigan will win 3-4 games this year.

But what do I know........I just rewrite history. Let me go into sarcasm mode for a minute. Michigan will go 13-0 this year and win the national championship. Tate will win the heisman and anything less than a National title will be a disappointment.

Is that better?
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.08080 seconds with 9 queries