|
The problem with Chad Hagan is that he didn't play as a sophomore, and it is hard to tell where he fits at the collegiate level. I'm not convinced he has the natural skills to be an every down RB, but he could play RB...could play LB, could play S...more of an ATH right now and not necessarily a football player that is instinctive or destined for one position. Definitely not a no-brainer.
------------
Don't want to take the thread way off topic, but Turner definitely had a monster day...heard nothing but great things about him. He is going to be a terror for the majority of OTs in college. Some players you just know will be impressive collegiate football players, Turner fits the bill every which way.
Mike Hull showed up very impressively (physically) at 6'1 209. Already 4* on rivals but they said he wasn't big enough to be rivals 100, which is funny because I can count at least 20 + LBs in the last 4-5 classes that were rivals 100, and all 20 were shorter and weighed less then Hull. Bob L. said if he isn't a 5*, he'll be a high 4* throughout. Expect a big senior year on the field from him since he didn't wrestle his junior year, should really be rejuvenated after getting a break from football, wrestling, baseball, and his daily workouts.
Paul Jones impressed as well, threw very well. He was supposed to make a trip back to PSU at the end of the month because a lot of key prospects will be up, but he'll instead be in Columbus (OH) for the Scout 7-on-7, representing PA. Bob L. may very well be blowing smoke, but he has said that PJ WILL be a 5* prospect on scout (already 4* on both scout/rivals - rivals 100 prospect), if not in this latest update, the next one....and he is a Pitt homer so that makes me feel good. Good luck with Montana.
Last edited by PennState; 03-19-2009 at 05:58 PM.
|