View Single Post
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 03-24-2009, 09:34 AM
schultgb's Avatar
schultgb schultgb is offline
My sarcasm doesn't translate to BP
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 215
Points: 121.47
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 121.47
schultgb is in the two-deepschultgb is in the two-deepschultgb is in the two-deepschultgb is in the two-deepschultgb is in the two-deepschultgb is in the two-deepschultgb is in the two-deepschultgb is in the two-deepschultgb is in the two-deepschultgb is in the two-deepschultgb is in the two-deepschultgb is in the two-deepschultgb is in the two-deepschultgb is in the two-deepschultgb is in the two-deepschultgb is in the two-deepschultgb is in the two-deepschultgb is in the two-deepschultgb is in the two-deepschultgb is in the two-deep
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheetah View Post
The numbers from Scout's combines are notoriously off. And I mean WAY off. They can't even get the heights and weights right half the time. It's not as well done as the Nike combines. They always have kids running 4.2s at that thing and then later it's found out the kid is nowhere near that fast. Put it this way, if that kid ran a 4.29 at 200+ pounds, he would have offers coming from everywhere. Even Pitt hasn't offered him.
Grades and general football skills are no longer things that coaches look for in prospects? That's an interesting shift in recruiting.

And if he wasn't legitimately fast, there would be others posting similar numbers at that combine. As evidenced above he was clearly among the fastest at the combine.
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.08685 seconds with 9 queries