View Single Post
  #759 (permalink)  
Old 06-17-2009, 11:16 AM
itownbuckeye itownbuckeye is offline
Heisman
 
BP Donor
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Blacklick, OH
Posts: 525
Points: 101,217.52
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 101,217.52
itownbuckeye has a helmet full of Buckeyes!itownbuckeye has a helmet full of Buckeyes!itownbuckeye has a helmet full of Buckeyes!itownbuckeye has a helmet full of Buckeyes!itownbuckeye has a helmet full of Buckeyes!itownbuckeye has a helmet full of Buckeyes!itownbuckeye has a helmet full of Buckeyes!itownbuckeye has a helmet full of Buckeyes!itownbuckeye has a helmet full of Buckeyes!itownbuckeye has a helmet full of Buckeyes!itownbuckeye has a helmet full of Buckeyes!itownbuckeye has a helmet full of Buckeyes!itownbuckeye has a helmet full of Buckeyes!itownbuckeye has a helmet full of Buckeyes!itownbuckeye has a helmet full of Buckeyes!itownbuckeye has a helmet full of Buckeyes!itownbuckeye has a helmet full of Buckeyes!itownbuckeye has a helmet full of Buckeyes!itownbuckeye has a helmet full of Buckeyes!itownbuckeye has a helmet full of Buckeyes!itownbuckeye has a helmet full of Buckeyes!itownbuckeye has a helmet full of Buckeyes!itownbuckeye has a helmet full of Buckeyes!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe McKnoe View Post
Maybe we should be more worried about him being 5'8"!?
Why worry about him being 5'8"? I don't understand why people make a big deal about the height of running backs. How does being tall help a RB? If anything, I'd prefer a RB who is a little on the short side than on the tall side. They have a lower center of gravity, can better hide behind the line, are harder to get a good hit on and are generally more agile/elusive than tall RB's.
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.11628 seconds with 9 queries