View Single Post
  #760 (permalink)  
Old 06-17-2009, 11:28 AM
sparcboxbuck's Avatar
sparcboxbuck sparcboxbuck is offline
Custom User Title
 
BP Donor
BP Donor
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,040
Points: 53,471,892.45
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 53,471,892.45
sparcboxbuck is a BP legendsparcboxbuck is a BP legendsparcboxbuck is a BP legendsparcboxbuck is a BP legendsparcboxbuck is a BP legendsparcboxbuck is a BP legend
sparcboxbuck is a BP legendsparcboxbuck is a BP legendsparcboxbuck is a BP legendsparcboxbuck is a BP legendsparcboxbuck is a BP legendsparcboxbuck is a BP legendsparcboxbuck is a BP legendsparcboxbuck is a BP legendsparcboxbuck is a BP legendsparcboxbuck is a BP legendsparcboxbuck is a BP legendsparcboxbuck is a BP legendsparcboxbuck is a BP legendsparcboxbuck is a BP legendsparcboxbuck is a BP legendsparcboxbuck is a BP legendsparcboxbuck is a BP legendsparcboxbuck is a BP legendsparcboxbuck is a BP legendsparcboxbuck is a BP legendsparcboxbuck is a BP legendsparcboxbuck is a BP legendsparcboxbuck is a BP legendsparcboxbuck is a BP legend
Quote:
Originally Posted by itownbuckeye View Post
Why worry about him being 5'8"? I don't understand why people make a big deal about the height of running backs. How does being tall help a RB? If anything, I'd prefer a RB who is a little on the short side than on the tall side. They have a lower center of gravity, can better hide behind the line, are harder to get a good hit on and are generally more agile/elusive than tall RB's.
There is a recent RB from tsun who is 0-4 v. tOSU who fits that description pretty well.

Personally, I'll take my B10+1 RBs built like a tank... who can and _want_ to run over and thru you... If I never see a sub 5'10" back in S&G trying to run between tackles again... it will be too soon.
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.08036 seconds with 9 queries