Thread: College Playoff
View Single Post
  #1566 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2009, 06:06 PM
AuburnBuckeye's Avatar
AuburnBuckeye AuburnBuckeye is offline
Ben Tate has a Kimbo Slice beard
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: London, OH
Posts: 343
Points: 313.13
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 313.13
AuburnBuckeye is a first round draft pickAuburnBuckeye is a first round draft pick
AuburnBuckeye is a first round draft pickAuburnBuckeye is a first round draft pickAuburnBuckeye is a first round draft pickAuburnBuckeye is a first round draft pickAuburnBuckeye is a first round draft pickAuburnBuckeye is a first round draft pickAuburnBuckeye is a first round draft pickAuburnBuckeye is a first round draft pickAuburnBuckeye is a first round draft pickAuburnBuckeye is a first round draft pickAuburnBuckeye is a first round draft pickAuburnBuckeye is a first round draft pickAuburnBuckeye is a first round draft pickAuburnBuckeye is a first round draft pickAuburnBuckeye is a first round draft pickAuburnBuckeye is a first round draft pickAuburnBuckeye is a first round draft pick
Quote:
Originally Posted by zincfinger View Post
It's a commonly used metaphor with a pretty clear meaning, but if you're applying it the way I read it, it seems a bit contradictory with what you purport to be your general view here. As I read it, the band-aid is the 4-team playoff, and the wound is the unfairness of the college football postseason. Is that right? If so, then you will be the one who will be immediately dissatisfied with the 4-team playoff and start calling for an 8-team playoff, maybe thereafter a 16-team playoff, and after that, who knows? The future is wide open, and all we know for certain is that it would be typical of our civilizational shortsightedness to apply the band-aid of a mere 4-team playoff to the wound of the national championship process, when what we really need is more along the lines of a 16-team colectomy.
No, what I meant by that is that the 4 team playoff isn't going to solve all the problems, but it may very well be the best thing we have at this point. (This is also up for substantial debate)
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.12585 seconds with 9 queries