![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| 2005 Football Season Capsule The main threads for each of the 2005 season games. Looking ahead to the upcoming season, these threads will serve as a future timecapsule. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Sponsored Links |
|
|||||||||
|
I think we were lucky to come back as well as we did against MSU, but what I dont' get is why OSU's mistakes are reasons why we shouldn't win and MSU's mistakes are reasons they should have won but squandered.
They should have tackled Holmes on the last td of his, but the Ginn play was just toughness by him running into and over a LBer and sprinting for the TD. I think we battled very hard and put ourselves in position, and caught a few lucky breaks (which may have turned into scores later anyway had we not fumbled the ball (that was the main way they slowed us down). MSU was in the game b/c of how we gave the game away. The first Holmes fumble was a miscommunication (he needed the next line of guys to field it b/c it was too far to run up, yet they didn't hear him and he couldn't get there). Ginn has caught a lot of balls bouncing off of the turf, so that was a little uncharacteristic of him too. The roughing the passer call was nothing they did either. Our mistakes were huge turnovers that definitely led to some of their scoring. For the most part, their mistakes (other than the FG) were missed tackles against talented players. If they make those tackles, we may very well go onto score still. |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
is it just me or does smith look more comfortable under center? It seems that when he's in the shotgun he gets antsy in the pocket. Dropping back seems to help his timing. |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Last edited by jwinslow; 01-28-2008 at 12:24 AM. |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Smith still seems to be having problems reading defenses and hitting receivers that are just a little open. The 2 TD's were good balls, but won't go for TD's against better teams. Ginn was invisible again except for his TD. It's also a little disturbing that only 4 players touched the ball on offense. We are going to have to play better if we are going to beat Minn, NU, and scum. Hopefully the game at Indiana will give the offense a chance to get on track. |
|
|||||||||
|
agreed that we need to make big strides, especially in holding onto the ball. I think the lack of distribution was a product of the formations we ran. The one option that may have been ignored was Hamby, IMO, and he's struggled somewhat lately. Gonzo was not involved in many plays, and we often went to other WRs when he was in the game, which usually worked well. He needs to get more involved, no doubt, but you have to put it into perspective. Usually we run many more plays and he is a small contributor (save a few games like Iowa, or the Alamo Bowl).
Gonzo played teddy's role sometimes today, and surprise, he was the one that disappeared. That is a problem, but I'm ok with our #3 WR not getting much action (vs. our #2 who is always in). What I loved seeing were some of the adjustments that were made. Gonzo ran the out route (decoy) a few times, opening up Ginn downfield (including the TD). Ginn had some good blocks out there too. We were spoiled by some unbelievable performances by Teddy, and now I think we expect too much. IIRC, he caught two first down passes on the OSU sideline in addition to his TD where he shut up some of his "afraid of contact" critics. It's pretty hard for him to get that involved when we missed at least 20-30 plays that most games would include thanks to turnovers. |
|
|||||||||
|
The one problem I have with the "decoy" strategy is that it is only going to work if the decoy is a credible threat. I feel that means the decoy is actually thrown to at least once or twice, to keep the opposing DB's guessing as to who is the primary receiver.
With only 3 players hauling in receptions there isn't a decoy, there is a void. In saying this I'm not knocking Smith, more so I'm wondering about the sophistication with which the staff tries to set up the shell game of primary receiver vs decoy. |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||||||||
|
<TABLE cellPadding=2 width=135 align=right><TBODY><TR><TD width=125></TD></TR><TR><TD><CENTER></CENTER>
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE> Quote:
hard to ask anything more of him. great game ay. i don't think boone will take the starting position this year. but this will likely not be the last time we see him in the season. id imagine he will get a decent amount of playing time as a backup from here on out. without an injury, i don't see pittman giving up his starting position to anyone period. |
|
|||||||||
|
Hell, I think Pittman is a force now. Get Dionte Johnson into the game and set Pittman loose!!! He's going to break 1,000 yards this year. Can you remember when an OSU tailback did that? Ummmmm.....uhhhh....Jonathan Wells, right?
Barton is our best lineman, in my opinion. Although Boone may continue to start, it won't be for Barton. Datish maybe. |
|
|||||||||
|
Pittman will surpass 1,000 yards this year, which is huge since that hasnt been done since '02. The only reason why Pittman isnt having an even better year is because of lack of attempts, hes simply not getting 20-35 carries a game like other running backs do.
With that being said, I cant wait for Chris Wells to come in next year, im young, but ive never seen anything like that kid... |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||||||||
|
My Pictures
Sadly, many pictures were ruined by the tall heads in front of me (TheStoicPansiano was two seats to the right of these heads, so he can't be blamed [IMG]../gallery/files/1/4/3/2/IMG_3113_thumb.jpg[/IMG] )However, there were still some good pictures. Some of these are gonna be turned into wallpapers. |
|
|||||||||
|
i figured pictures of that bird would pop up sooner or later
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|