![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| 2006 Football Season Capsule The main threads for each of the 2006 season games. Looking ahead to the upcoming season, these threads will serve as a future timecapsule. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||||||||
|
I'll take some pictures for you.
With Indiana winning two in a row, one of them over a respected Iowa team, all of a sudden this game can't be overlooked. While Iowa losing doesn't help our SOS, it does serve notice to the Buckeyes that they should be ready to play ball on Saturday. Tressel will be able to show the team that Indiana means business and they are playing inspired football right now. Built in motivation. |
| Sponsored Links |
|
|||||||||
|
I agree, Scooter. When I saw the score between Indiana, and Iowa, I nearly fell over.
Suddenly this game became scary lol. A team with nothing to loose, has a lot to win.... |
|
|||||||||
|
This game could be much more competitive than the msu game. A healthy, mobile and relatively unknown QB and a very talented receiver. These guys are definitely on a high right now after beating Iowa and will absolutely believe they can compete with the Buckeyes. Should be a good game to watch.
|
|
|||||||||
|
Seeing as we play both Iowa and Indiana, the result of the Iowa/Indiana game was moot...we we lost in Iowa's lowered power ranking we gain back in Indiana's increased power ranking.
|
|
|||||||||
|
41-7. I see a very similar game to last year. Unfortunately I won't be there to witness it live this time.
![]() |
|
|||||||||
|
I am not worried. It is good that Indiana is not going to be as much of a pushover as originally thought. I think we will drop them soundly.
I watched part of the Iowa - Indiana clash. It seemed pretty clear that Iowa was gutted by the loss to Ohio State. They walked out on that field and thought they would take us. But as we all know, get into Drew Tate's head and you own them. We did it. Indiana did it. Iowa lost to us. They appeared to give up against Indiana. They were thinking that they should be killing Indiana. Tate was being Tate and then Iowa was being Tate. You could see that somewhere there, they just stopped believing in themselves. To me, there is a real lesson here for football coaches at the college level. Right temperament, right skills: Troy Smith, a winner Wrong temperament, wrong skills: You name the loser In both cases, it is very easy for a coach to know what to do. The confusing case is what to do when you have a player who shows signs of Wrong temperament, right skills: Drew Tate This always is played out in terms such as, "he just wants to win so badly", and you can see it clearly in a high school player. In former times, these players were kept and nurtured. It may simply be that many players just can't learn how to manage their emotions and exhibit the right temperament and that college coaches need to realize that a player like Tate is a cancer. We've lost a few players during the Tressel-era who appear to have had the right skills but the wrong temperament and Tressel seems to be a master at managing his teams for temperament. On the other hand, perhaps that's a difference between Tressel and Ferentz. A low social-IQ player like Tate doesn't lead but rather saps the spirit of a team by providing the opposite of leadership: self-absorption and self-abuse. Rather bench him and put someone out there who may have less skill, but who can lead the team. Iowa should have beat Indiana soundly. We will. Edit: For a good, if somewhat long, read on this topic, see Goleman's new book Social Intelligence. To you guys in coaching, I think this should be required reading. Last edited by Steve19; 10-16-2006 at 04:11 AM. |
|
|||||||||
|
Iowa couldn't hang with us...Indiana played it's heart out to barely nip Iowa. Indiana would have to play BETTER than they did against Iowa, and we would have to play our worst game of the year, for this game to even be close in the fourth quarter. And if...BY SOME CRAZY MIRACLE...it is close in the fourth quarter...the fact that we are so deep and conditioned, will take over. Iowa was looking past Indiana to Michigan. Frankly, we could afford to do that, because we could score enough points in one quarter to beat Indiana. Honestly, if we lose this game...or any game up until THE GAME...then i'll be ashamed.
I'm thinking we probably come out flat and don't bring our A game and win somewhere around 38-10. I'd like to see Chris Wells get over 100 yards rushing...limit Pittmans carries if you don't need him, and just stay injury free. |
|
|||||||||
|
We own Indiana like few other teams own another. Check this out:
Last edited by MililaniBuckeye; 10-16-2006 at 11:53 AM. Reason: 0-5-1 is six games, not five dumbass... |
|
|||||||||
|
Link
Quote:
|
|
|||||||||
|
Link
LONG DROUGHT: No. 1 Ohio State?s next opponent, Indiana this Saturday at Ohio Stadium, got its first win over a top 15 team in 19 years when it beat Iowa 31-28 on Saturday. The last time Indiana beat a top 15 team was Oct. 10, 1987, when it won 31-10 over Ohio State. |
|
|||||||||
|
JT won't let the boys run up the score. 50 points? No way.
Maybe 40, but I doubt even that. Question is will the Hoosiers have any gas left in the tank after expending so much energy in beating Iowa? I think they are motivated and a solid team. |
|
|||||||||
|
I'll give you a thumbs up on the first part of that statement and beg to differ on the second. They played over their abilities while Iowa played below theirs this Saturday.
Motivated yes, solid? Not sold on that. |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
(It makes a big difference in whether I bet the farm on Ohio State to cover.) I agree, though. Indiana will be down 4+ touchdowns before they score a point. And, yes, they will score. It will likely be against Ohio State's back-ups, like Michigan State scored. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|