![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| 2008 Football Season Capsule Posts, conversation, content, etc. related to specific 2008 games. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||||||||
|
You forgot the old standby - Pete Carroll was having a bad hair day
|
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
The truth is, we are catching USC at a good time. Early in the year, they will be as inexperienced in key areas as they've been in a few years. We can call it "excuse making" if we want. To a certain extent, it is "excuse making" to say such things. But there is also a certain legitimacy to putting this win, if we get it, into perspective. Yes, it will be huge. Yes, it will be over a very good team. It will be USC's 2nd OOC loss in what, 5 years? We don't need to make it any bigger by downplaying the opponent's lack of experience. I understand that you aren't doing that; but others commenting on this subject have done exactly that. |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
In fact, it was in thinking about our own inexperienced team going up against a more seasoned (and stronger) team last January that I composed my post. While others may apply a different standard to us than to USC, let's be careful that we don't do the same thing but in the other direction. Let's acknowledge that our opponent has more holes to fill than we do. It's OK. We can be fair, even when "they" are not. We're Ohio State. Being held to a higher standard is part of the territory, regardless if it is a blessing or a curse. |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
highly ranked preseason, media rambles on about how they are "loaded with talent" and how their bench players could start for most other schools they lose to a Stanford or Oregon State and it is a "fluke" and every year at the end of the season we have to hear about how USC is "the best team right now" even though they did not get it done earlier in the season against subpar competition and then the media goes on about how to "watch out fo them next year, they will be better!" |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
I agree that WE can do the emboldened; however, I'm not seeing a whole lot of that from the media pundits. Case in point: Cowherd said that there will be 15 NFL pros on the defense in the game. Nine from USC and 6 from OSU. He did say that the Offensive line for USC is inexperienced; however, there was no statement throughout his entire discussion that there is really any weakness to the USC team. In truth, he didn't say that tOSU had any glaring weaknesses either; however, the inundation of "recent history" IS playing a huge role. The transitory effect plays a role when people think of tOSU; however, USC doesn't get much of that if at all. |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Don't get me wrong; I've said before and I'll say again that it will be a huge win. But Colin "how-does-this-asshat-have-a-syndicated-show" Cowherd will make it into something it isn't, both before and after. |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||||||||
|
The media love affair with USC has been going on for most of PC's tenure, they did give them a NC they didn't earn. The disparity between the media's attitude between USC and OSU is quite glaring. Look at last year, OSU was slighted all year because of an atypically weak Big Ten schedule, often described as "charmin soft". USC had a much weaker slate last year and got a free pass for losing 2 games. In the last 3 years, USC's marquee OOC opponent (other than the 1 good game ND gave them) was Arkansas, who was 14-11 over the two seasons they played. The criticism of playing a weak schedule in a weak conference applies much more to USC than OSU. As far as Cowherd talking up the Buckeyes, I certainly have never heard it. I used to catch his show frequently when I drove to work, and he had nothing but vitriol for the program and the fans.
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| 2008 game threads, 2008-09 football, abc broadcast fail, buckyle v methomps, collision in the coliseum, felony resisting arrest, i do not want, jock itch, o.j. simpson, pac-10, petey's #1 thread, primetime, pusc, the sky is falling, usc |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|