View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 05-23-2004, 02:21 PM
RugbyBuck's Avatar
RugbyBuck RugbyBuck is offline
Our church has no bells.
 
BP Donor
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,726
Points: 506,972.52
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 506,972.52
RugbyBuck is a poster the coaches call for advice.RugbyBuck is a poster the coaches call for advice.RugbyBuck is a poster the coaches call for advice.RugbyBuck is a poster the coaches call for advice.RugbyBuck is a poster the coaches call for advice.RugbyBuck is a poster the coaches call for advice.RugbyBuck is a poster the coaches call for advice.RugbyBuck is a poster the coaches call for advice.RugbyBuck is a poster the coaches call for advice.RugbyBuck is a poster the coaches call for advice.RugbyBuck is a poster the coaches call for advice.RugbyBuck is a poster the coaches call for advice.
RugbyBuck is a poster the coaches call for advice.RugbyBuck is a poster the coaches call for advice.RugbyBuck is a poster the coaches call for advice.RugbyBuck is a poster the coaches call for advice.RugbyBuck is a poster the coaches call for advice.RugbyBuck is a poster the coaches call for advice.RugbyBuck is a poster the coaches call for advice.
I would be interested in a break-down of the marginal cost vs marginal utility of upper-echelon problem kids like WW, MoC, Randy Moss, etc. Obviously, I'm oversimplifying, but in Clarett's case, we got a NC, consequently higher publicity, positive and negative, and all the other additional +s and -s. Moss single-handedly pulled Marshall onto the national stage. Donnan had done a great job, but the country at large had no idea about Marshall. Are they worth it, from a measurable perspective? Are they more worth it for some schools than others?
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.18800 seconds with 9 queries