View Single Post
  #67 (permalink)  
Old 10-13-2005, 01:40 PM
exhawg's Avatar
exhawg exhawg is offline
Legendary
Moderator
 
Cleveland Indians Cleveland Cavaliers Cleveland Browns Ohio State

Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,116
Points: 725,344.98
Bank: 27,845.14
Total Points: 753,190.12
exhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesque
exhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesqueexhawg is Tresselesque
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckeyeskickbuttocks
On a slightly serious note - I understand that real life gets in the way of submitting your ballot from time to time. So, with that in mind, what do you all think of the following:

1. KBuck and I do the Poll Tuesday Morn regardless of who has submitted their poll. This will lead to there not being a consistent number of votes each week, and is a plan of which I'm not particularly found.

2. We get 10 more people, and the first 25 to submit their poll are the pollsters for that week, and the other's are discarded. This leads to inconsisent week to week rankings (For example, if I get my ballot in 25th one week and have .... I don't know, say, Viginia rated 15... but the next week, I'm late, and Virginia gets no votes... Maybe it's not that big a deal..)

3. We keep on trucking as is

4. ANy ideas?
I like #2, but I know I would be upset if I turn my poll in Monday morning and it doesn't get counted because 25 others already sent their polls in. How hard would it be to use the normal 25 up until noon on Monday, but if anyone isn't in on time you replace them for the week with one of the extra 10?
__________________

God hates Michigan
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.07847 seconds with 9 queries