View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2005, 07:26 PM
buckiprof's Avatar
buckiprof buckiprof is offline
21st Century Buckeye Man
Senior Moderator
 
BP Donor

Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,398
Points: 4,306,216.75
Bank: 1,505.29
Total Points: 4,307,722.04
buckiprof is a revered BP posterbuckiprof is a revered BP posterbuckiprof is a revered BP posterbuckiprof is a revered BP posterbuckiprof is a revered BP posterbuckiprof is a revered BP posterbuckiprof is a revered BP posterbuckiprof is a revered BP posterbuckiprof is a revered BP posterbuckiprof is a revered BP poster
buckiprof is a revered BP posterbuckiprof is a revered BP posterbuckiprof is a revered BP posterbuckiprof is a revered BP posterbuckiprof is a revered BP posterbuckiprof is a revered BP posterbuckiprof is a revered BP posterbuckiprof is a revered BP poster
Quote:
I've posted before about them. I'm on a bowl committee so I have a vested interest.
To me, everything posted after that first sentence isn't worth a damn. His argument, if that is what you want to call it, is in light of how to preseve the status quo. This sentence,

Quote:
As for the BCS, I think its worked pretty well. As well as any playoff anyway.
is quite ludicrous. How can one say that it works well, as well as any playoff, when an undefeated SEC team last year was left out. How about the year before when there was a split championship?
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.19437 seconds with 9 queries