View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2006, 07:11 PM
tedginn05's Avatar
tedginn05 tedginn05 is offline
Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 4,773
Points: 13,173.70
Bank: 158,662.90
Total Points: 171,836.60
tedginn05 is all-Big Ten
tedginn05 is all-Big Tentedginn05 is all-Big Tentedginn05 is all-Big Tentedginn05 is all-Big Tentedginn05 is all-Big Tentedginn05 is all-Big Tentedginn05 is all-Big Tentedginn05 is all-Big Tentedginn05 is all-Big Tentedginn05 is all-Big Tentedginn05 is all-Big Tentedginn05 is all-Big Tentedginn05 is all-Big Tentedginn05 is all-Big Tentedginn05 is all-Big Tentedginn05 is all-Big Tentedginn05 is all-Big Tentedginn05 is all-Big Tentedginn05 is all-Big Ten
*Warning Beechcroft related post coming*

Antonio was on a academic scholie. He recieved that to OSU when he was a freshman.

Here is where confusion comes in. I can't remember, but one or more posters here stated that once if a player recieves a academic or athletic scholie, it still counts against the 85 limit.

So more on the total Mili said that that was the last one avail.

Are you sure about that?

I know, for a fact, 100% sure that he did indeed recieve a academic scholie to OSU. This came from my Head Coach at Beechcroft. He was speaking about the two players(Antonio and Sirjo) that are at OSU. He said Sirjo recieved a athletic and Antonio recieved academic.

So with that being said, wouldn't that scholie have already counted towards the 85 limit?

If so, there should be no change in the number.

Sorry I was starting to ramble on.
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.08412 seconds with 9 queries