Thread: Could an early signing period negate negative recruiting?
View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2007, 11:54 PM
OSUBucks22's Avatar
OSUBucks22 OSUBucks22 is offline
<<foo-koo-DOUGH-may
Moderator
  



Chicago Cubs New England Patriots Dayton

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kettering
Posts: 3,967
Points: 20,023.22
Bank: 45,301.43
Total Points: 65,324.65
OSUBucks22 is a BP legendOSUBucks22 is a BP legendOSUBucks22 is a BP legendOSUBucks22 is a BP legendOSUBucks22 is a BP legendOSUBucks22 is a BP legend
OSUBucks22 is a BP legendOSUBucks22 is a BP legendOSUBucks22 is a BP legendOSUBucks22 is a BP legendOSUBucks22 is a BP legendOSUBucks22 is a BP legendOSUBucks22 is a BP legendOSUBucks22 is a BP legendOSUBucks22 is a BP legendOSUBucks22 is a BP legendOSUBucks22 is a BP legendOSUBucks22 is a BP legendOSUBucks22 is a BP legendOSUBucks22 is a BP legendOSUBucks22 is a BP legendOSUBucks22 is a BP legendOSUBucks22 is a BP legendOSUBucks22 is a BP legendOSUBucks22 is a BP legendOSUBucks22 is a BP legend
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazybuckfan40 View Post
It is a good point, but honestly most of the recruits that verbal early are the ones that stick to them. The guys that go all the way with the period and make it crazy are the ones that wait till the end anyway.
True, but with the trend of "silent verbals" nowadays, some of those guys would be well served with an early signing period IMO... I know that most "silents" occur because a recruit wants to take other visits, but I'd be willing to bet that some would sign on early if they had the chance...
__________________
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.15186 seconds with 9 queries