|
Actually, I think the current system gives both the coaches and players for flexibility and freedom. Implementing an early signing day would force coaches to make more imcomplete evaluations much sooner, and thus decrease the number of hiding gems that they might undercover late in the game. Also, any decisions that recruits make are of their own volition. If a kid signs too soon and discovers that the coach is no longer there at the end of the season, what happens to the kid?
Edit: But to answer the original question, as long as there are negative recruiters out there, you can't completely negate negative recruiting. And as cbf stated, those who are susceptible to negative recruiting are usually the ones who verbal late in the game anyway.
|