Quote:
Originally Posted by Tresselbeliever
Well if you have already conceded that Stoneburner's biggest assets are his size and the potential matchups that he would create as a receiver, why not just call him a receiver instead of insisting that he's a TE?
There are ways to use a WR to stretch the middle of the defense, even small WRs such as Gonzo.
I guess what I'm saying is that the kid is coming to here to catch football, whether you would like to call him a flex TE or a SE or whatever. We got glorified tackles disguised as TEs for blocking purposes.
|
I say this b/c with his frame he is going to be 250-260 before we know it...
Either way it is splitting hairs...We know what his greatest assests are...