View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-31-2007, 02:28 AM
Buckeyecty4 Buckeyecty4 is offline
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 1,049
Points: 220.99
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 220.99
Buckeyecty4 is a Hall of FamerBuckeyecty4 is a Hall of Famer
Buckeyecty4 is a Hall of FamerBuckeyecty4 is a Hall of FamerBuckeyecty4 is a Hall of FamerBuckeyecty4 is a Hall of FamerBuckeyecty4 is a Hall of FamerBuckeyecty4 is a Hall of FamerBuckeyecty4 is a Hall of FamerBuckeyecty4 is a Hall of FamerBuckeyecty4 is a Hall of FamerBuckeyecty4 is a Hall of FamerBuckeyecty4 is a Hall of FamerBuckeyecty4 is a Hall of FamerBuckeyecty4 is a Hall of FamerBuckeyecty4 is a Hall of FamerBuckeyecty4 is a Hall of FamerBuckeyecty4 is a Hall of FamerBuckeyecty4 is a Hall of FamerBuckeyecty4 is a Hall of FamerBuckeyecty4 is a Hall of FamerBuckeyecty4 is a Hall of FamerBuckeyecty4 is a Hall of FamerBuckeyecty4 is a Hall of Famer
I hate the multiple games... Two big ones is okay... but after that you're just breaking up too many of the top players... I want to see the best of the best playing in one game.. not spread out over 3 or 4 games..

It's kinda like the Big 33 game and Ohio N/S... the fact that the talent is split up between the two games hurts both games in my mind...

I'm cool if all the top guys still opt to attend the Army All American like they should... it works hand in hand with the US Army and promotes a strong message... the combines down in San Antonio are well established, and i would like to see the best talent still opt to participate in that game..

After that I'm okay if ESPN and Rivals has an All-Star game with some of the next tier talent (guys who are in like the Rivals250, but outside the Top100) of some of the kids in the Top100 who didnt get selected for the AA game...

That is cool... but i hope it doesnt get to the point where all 3 of these games starts pressuring the top players to each attend their particular game, and then u have the top talent all broken up..
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.13583 seconds with 9 queries