Thread: Big Ten Network
View Single Post
  #664 (permalink)  
Old 08-24-2007, 10:54 AM
Cincinnatibuck's Avatar
Cincinnatibuck Cincinnatibuck is offline
All-American
 

Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 328
Points: 1,437,296.56
Bank: 62,848.36
Total Points: 1,500,144.92
Cincinnatibuck is in the two-deepCincinnatibuck is in the two-deepCincinnatibuck is in the two-deepCincinnatibuck is in the two-deepCincinnatibuck is in the two-deepCincinnatibuck is in the two-deepCincinnatibuck is in the two-deepCincinnatibuck is in the two-deepCincinnatibuck is in the two-deepCincinnatibuck is in the two-deepCincinnatibuck is in the two-deepCincinnatibuck is in the two-deepCincinnatibuck is in the two-deepCincinnatibuck is in the two-deepCincinnatibuck is in the two-deepCincinnatibuck is in the two-deepCincinnatibuck is in the two-deepCincinnatibuck is in the two-deep
Quote:
Originally Posted by matcar View Post
I still don't know why BTN is opposed to allowing TW or Comcast to put this on a sports tier. OK, so DirecTV and Dish may not choose that, but why are the cable companies preventing from doing it that way?
If it's not on the basic package here in Cincinnati, that means customers would have to pay $7 a month to get a digital cable box. You would only be able to watch the game on the TV with the digital cable box. You would also need to subscribe to the Sports Package, another $2.95 (current price) a month. So for the $1.10 the Big Ten Network would charge Time Warner, a customer with just basic cable would have to pay Time Warner $10 a month to have the ability watch the game on one TV.
__________________
I'd rather win ugly than lose pretty
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.08962 seconds with 9 queries