View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-27-2007, 10:56 AM
BrutuStrength's Avatar
BrutuStrength BrutuStrength is offline
()]-[|()
Senior Moderator
 
BP Donor
Pittsburgh Steelers Ohio State

Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 4,111
Points: 1,079,366.65
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 1,079,366.65
BrutuStrength is a revered BP posterBrutuStrength is a revered BP posterBrutuStrength is a revered BP posterBrutuStrength is a revered BP posterBrutuStrength is a revered BP posterBrutuStrength is a revered BP posterBrutuStrength is a revered BP posterBrutuStrength is a revered BP poster
BrutuStrength is a revered BP posterBrutuStrength is a revered BP posterBrutuStrength is a revered BP posterBrutuStrength is a revered BP posterBrutuStrength is a revered BP posterBrutuStrength is a revered BP posterBrutuStrength is a revered BP posterBrutuStrength is a revered BP posterBrutuStrength is a revered BP posterBrutuStrength is a revered BP posterBrutuStrength is a revered BP posterBrutuStrength is a revered BP posterBrutuStrength is a revered BP posterBrutuStrength is a revered BP posterBrutuStrength is a revered BP posterBrutuStrength is a revered BP posterBrutuStrength is a revered BP poster
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taosman View Post
Is calling someone a "Homo" as bad as using the "N" word to describe someone in a derogatory way?
I can't imagine it being even close. I'd think a term such as "fag" would be found more offensive, and even that I wouldn't see as being nearly as bad as the "N" word, but I could certainly understand that people would find the term offensive.

"Homo" is really just an abbreviation of the full term "homosexual." Since someone calling someone else a "homo" would be intending to call them a "homosexual," then there doesn't seem to be anything for anyone to upset about. Unless, that is, if someone were to find the term "homosexual" offensive.
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.09275 seconds with 9 queries