Thread: Big Ten Network
View Single Post
  #826 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2007, 12:07 PM
IronBuckI's Avatar
IronBuckI IronBuckI is offline
misunderestimated
 
Cincinnati Reds Cleveland Browns

Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,513
Points: 4,359,336.19
Bank: 91.02
Total Points: 4,359,427.21
IronBuckI is a revered BP posterIronBuckI is a revered BP posterIronBuckI is a revered BP posterIronBuckI is a revered BP posterIronBuckI is a revered BP posterIronBuckI is a revered BP posterIronBuckI is a revered BP posterIronBuckI is a revered BP poster
IronBuckI is a revered BP poster
Quote:
Originally Posted by matcar View Post
We can debate endlessly what and how cable and sat companies come up with their channel lineups and never get anywhere. My simple point is that you can just as easily argue that a cable company IS taking up for their constituents considering that the majority of viewers (factoring in women, homes outside of B10 country etc) nationwide probably don't care about the channel.
Which is why homes outside the 8 states of the Big Ten are being charged a lower rate. Or at least that was the deal when this mess started.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
 
Page generated in 0.07440 seconds with 9 queries