Thread: Big Ten Network
View Single Post
  #827 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2007, 12:20 PM
martinss01's Avatar
martinss01 martinss01 is offline
blissfully stupid
 
BP Donor

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: cincy
Posts: 3,028
Points: 1,503,214.96
Bank: 1,487.62
Total Points: 1,504,702.58
martinss01 is Tresselesquemartinss01 is Tresselesquemartinss01 is Tresselesquemartinss01 is Tresselesque
martinss01 is Tresselesquemartinss01 is Tresselesquemartinss01 is Tresselesquemartinss01 is Tresselesquemartinss01 is Tresselesquemartinss01 is Tresselesquemartinss01 is Tresselesquemartinss01 is Tresselesquemartinss01 is Tresselesquemartinss01 is Tresselesquemartinss01 is Tresselesquemartinss01 is Tresselesquemartinss01 is Tresselesquemartinss01 is Tresselesquemartinss01 is Tresselesquemartinss01 is Tresselesquemartinss01 is Tresselesquemartinss01 is Tresselesquemartinss01 is Tresselesquemartinss01 is Tresselesquemartinss01 is Tresselesquemartinss01 is Tresselesquemartinss01 is Tresselesque
Quote:
Originally Posted by matcar View Post
Not really. Nationwide, there are a majority of people who are not fans of Big Ten football. So they are not ignoring them in this case.
so if people in california don't want a channel, it can't be offered in ohio? what if people in alaska aren't interested in a channel being offered to those in hawaii? do they just not get it?

here, let me quote vic for you again:

Quote:
they have stood their ground to this network despite heavy fan pressure
to me a heavy fan pressure indicates a high number of customers. or atleast a significant enough number of customers that it is difficult to ignore. which means were talking about a majority or a significant minority. of which these persons are interested enough to apply pressure on the cable companies. whats more, if a significant % is being vocal, an even larger % is not.
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.09033 seconds with 9 queries