Quote:
Originally Posted by jwinslow
My question is, where is the evidence of his coaching pedigree? Who has he coached up? I know UM's talent has been lacking a bit in the secondary, but it's hard to identify his coaching.
OTOH, the LB coaching between 05 & 06 was obvious... dramatic difference. They did have better clay to mold, but the improvements were dramatic.Do you think English is the perfect coach, or is it more a preference over Carr and his twin Debord?
|
Well, the defense improved drastically from 05 to 06. Had the majority of the same players, and they were significantly better. He's not 100% proven, let's not kid ourselves. He still needs work, but I'd take him over Lloyd.
For the second part, I'd say it's a bit of both. English is a great recruiter, young, energetic, fiery, in your face etc....everything Lloyd isn't. If DeBord becomes the coach I will be tempted to change my favorite team. His idea of a creative play is TEs running intersecting crossing routes. God I hate him. Loved the Mallett at TE call though. There's no [censored]ing way UM with all of their firepower should only score 32 points vs. Appalachian State. We need an O-coordinator who will take the shackles off this playbook. [censored], if it's 3rd and 12, go 5 wide or something like that. Creativity, please.