Thread: 2008 Rivals/Scout/etc. National & Regional Rankings
View Single Post
  #566 (permalink)  
Old 10-17-2007, 12:08 PM
westbuck04's Avatar
westbuck04 westbuck04 is online now
Wildcard, b*tches
  
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 583
Points: 1,539.01
Bank: 409.79
Total Points: 1,948.80
westbuck04 is all-Big Ten
westbuck04 is all-Big Tenwestbuck04 is all-Big Tenwestbuck04 is all-Big Tenwestbuck04 is all-Big Tenwestbuck04 is all-Big Tenwestbuck04 is all-Big Tenwestbuck04 is all-Big Tenwestbuck04 is all-Big Tenwestbuck04 is all-Big Tenwestbuck04 is all-Big Tenwestbuck04 is all-Big Tenwestbuck04 is all-Big Ten
Quote:
Originally Posted by wadc45 View Post

Defense coming tomorrow...I thought the Rivals250 and Rivals100 were awful but these position rankings are just deplorable...and not just when it comes to OSU recruits. Rodriguez Wilks as the #75 WR in the country? With offers from OSU, Tennessee, Florida, etc.? C'mon. Brewster rated as a tackle? Shaw rated as a tackle? Fauria rated as a tackle? Koehler rated as a guard? Just awful. Looking at the rankings for RBs vs. all-purpose backs just goes to show that I think most of the time they just throw a kid in a category based on his measurables. If he is under 5-9 or under 180 lbs. they put him in the APB category.

I am thisclose to not posting anymore Rivals rankings this year...that's how bad they are...now on to some rankings by some people who aren't certifiably crazy.
They also have Lamaar Thomas rated as a CORNER (?). Absolutely baffling, considering that of the 3 positions he's projected at, no schools are even talking corner with him.

-EDIT-

Rivals has Thomas rated as an ATH again. Last week when they put out there new top 100, he was ranked as a corner.
Last edited by westbuck04; 10-17-2007 at 02:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.07901 seconds with 9 queries