View Single Post
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 10-18-2007, 10:01 AM
ekeen's Avatar
ekeen ekeen is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: West of Campus
Posts: 2,590
Points: 5,975.64
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 5,975.64
ekeen is in the two-deepekeen is in the two-deepekeen is in the two-deepekeen is in the two-deepekeen is in the two-deepekeen is in the two-deepekeen is in the two-deepekeen is in the two-deepekeen is in the two-deepekeen is in the two-deepekeen is in the two-deepekeen is in the two-deepekeen is in the two-deepekeen is in the two-deepekeen is in the two-deepekeen is in the two-deepekeen is in the two-deepekeen is in the two-deepekeen is in the two-deep
It's hard to hold a civilian accountable to rules governed by the UCMJ. For instance, if a married civilian contractor from Blackwater went and had and affair with an Iraqi national, he could be punished under the UCMJ for adultery, and possibly be thrown in the brig (jail).

We have had past instances where a commander in chief was guilty for breaking laws under the UCMJ yet he was not punishable for said laws, even though he was the commander in chief.

So, I think there's a hard case to make for UCMJ application here.
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.08727 seconds with 9 queries