Role of recruiting's intermediaries gets slippery
One source says that agents depend on intermediaries much of the time in a process that is full of potential for breaking the rules.
The process often starts with the same four words.
I got this kid . . . .
The phrase might come from a club basketball coach, a shoe company executive, a friend or a relative -- anyone who believes he can parlay his connection to a star player into a handsome payout.
How does it happen?
In an interview, a prominent agent described how so-called "runners" serve as intermediaries between top prospects and agents hoping to cash in when the player turns pro. The agent, who has represented several NBA players, spoke on condition of anonymity out of concern that his comments might be construed as an admission he had engaged in wrongdoing.
Overwhelmingly, 95% of the time, there's a third party involved" in player-agent relationships, the agent said.
"If agents could get players in a fair, representative way without paying money they would, because everyone is a bottom-line businessman," he added. "But they can't."
Interest in how runners work recently piqued when a former associate accused Rodney Guillory, an L.A.-based events promoter, of accepting about $250,000 in cash and gifts from a sports agency and funneling them to basketball star O.J. Mayo before and during the player's one season on the USC basketball team. The allegations are being investigated by the NCAA, Pacific 10 Conference and NBA Players' Assn.
Payments to runners are made either directly or through yet another intermediary -- perhaps a real estate broker, car salesman, banker or financial advisor. There are advantages to each approach. The use of an intermediary provides the agent with plausible deniability, but direct payments leave less of a trail with fewer people involved.
The going rate for a runner, the agent said, is 1% to 2% of a player's estimated contract. For a $5-million contract, that would amount to anywhere between $50,000 and $100,000. An agent's standard 4% cut of the same contract would be $200,000.....continued......
Entire article:
Role of recruiting's intermediaries gets slippery - Los Angeles Times
