6 Fouls?

crazybuckfan40 · #1 (**permalink**) 04-03-2007, 04:37 PM

I have heard it thrown around a lot in the past couple weeks...

What do you guys think about the idea of giving guys 6 fouls in college...

I watched too many tournament games where it felt like the refs were able to dictate who was on the floor.

They either need to let there be more contact on the floor or add an extra foul...

I understand that foul trouble is part of the game, but when refs are calling touch foul, they make a call everytime someone flops, and struggle to understand the difference between a charge and block, players are going to pick up cheap fouls and takes away from players being able to play aggressive and physical...

I am all for adding an extra foul to foul out, Thoughts?

jwinslow · #2 (**permalink**) 04-03-2007, 04:39 PM

Quote:

I watched too many tournament games where it felt like the refs were able to dictate who was on the floor.

There need to be technical fouls and suspensions for refs who make the game about them instead of the players.

The amount of ticky tack fouls called (most of which had zero impact on the play) last night was ridiculous.

BuckeyeNation27 · #3 (**permalink**) 04-03-2007, 04:40 PM

I heard somewhere that the refs for the tourney games get voted on to get to the next round. That would explain why they call it so tight.....if they miss a call they don't get to do another round.

It's a stupid way of doing things.

buckeyeboy · #4 (**permalink**) 04-03-2007, 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwinslow

There need to be technical fouls and suspensions for refs who make the game about them instead of the players.

Did someone say Ted Valentine?

crazybuckfan40 · #5 (**permalink**) 04-03-2007, 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwinslow

There need to be technical fouls and suspensions for refs who make the game about them instead of the players.

The amount of ticky tack fouls called (most of which had zero impact on the play) last night was ridiculous.

Yeah, I couldnt believe all the hand in the back fouls they were calling on Florida in the post, and also that foul they called on Butler when he swung at air was pretty pathetic as well...

They did call a pretty good second half, but the first half was questionable...Both ways...

jimotis4heisman · #6 (**permalink**) 04-03-2007, 04:48 PM

you couldnt believe they were calling hand on the back calls? arm bar, extend the arm. arm bar, extend.

the officiaiting needs to be more consistent. thats my biggest issue. it ruined the nba and its erroding cbb.

crazybuckfan40 · #7 (**permalink**) 04-03-2007, 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimotis4heisman

you couldnt believe they were calling hand on the back calls? arm bar, extend the arm. arm bar, extend.

You are allowed to have an arm in the back just not allowed to extend it, and if it isnt knocking the guy off of his path, but just contesting him, I don't see any problem with it...

Quote:

the officiaiting needs to be more consistent. thats my biggest issue. it ruined the nba and its erroding cbb.

I agree, I honestly think at times alot of it has to do with the officials, not having the same athletic ability to get up and down the court with the players, and there is too much flopping and screaming that the officials fall for...