Powlus as UND "Personnel Development" - Page 3

BuckeyeNation27 · #31 (**permalink**) 03-04-2005, 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NDChump

When,were did I say that they were equals on the field! In order you to prove me wrong you must prove that!

http://www.buckeyeplanet.com/forum/s...824#post155799

osugrad21 · #32 (**permalink**) 03-04-2005, 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NOTREDAMECHIEF

YEP 10 less games and 8 more pics!

RP had a crappy defense so that would have a severe impact on the wins and losses. Want proof of that go look at that hole that Eddie ran thru....

Now where are CK's?

10 less games and just as many wins....

Whoa now...you said any tOSU player. I figured I would compare a similar QB statistically.

Would you like to throw any other stipulations on this debate?

You keep morphing the basics so Im just trying to keep up.

NOTREDAMECHIEF · #33 (**permalink**) 03-04-2005, 10:42 AM

27 Where?? Did you take a time out for a pacifier break?

You guys brought up CK....

Beside you all brought up how crappy he was on the field not wins and losses!
Guess he was not as crappy as you all thought. As a coach you of all people should know a QB can be decent but if he doesnt have a team behind him well..

BuckeyeNation27 · #34 (**permalink**) 03-04-2005, 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NOTREDAMECHIEF

27 Where?? Did you take a time out for a pacifier break?

You guys brought up CK....

Beside you all brought up how crappy he was on the field not wins and losses!
Guess he was not as crappy as you all thought...

seriously....how are you an adult? ive had conversations with children that didnt turn out like this.

osugrad21 · #35 (**permalink**) 03-04-2005, 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NOTREDAMECHIEF

Beside you all brought up how crappy he was on the field not wins and losses!
Guess he was not as crappy as you all thought...

a 63% career winning percentage is crappy

Quote:

Originally Posted by NOTREDAMECHIEF

As a coach you of all people should know a QB can be decent but if he doesnt have a team behind him well..

Your twisting is getting humorous...

NOTREDAMECHIEF · #36 (**permalink**) 03-04-2005, 11:44 AM

The Personal attacks stop now...

You and 27 can take it up in PMs but quit polluting the board with this garbage.

21

PM me if you have an issue...either of you

Jaxbuck · #37 (**permalink**) 03-08-2005, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NOTREDAMECHIEF

YEP 10 less games and 8 more pics!

RP had a crappy defense so that would have a severe impact on the wins and losses. Want proof of that go look at that hole that Eddie ran thru....

Now where are CK's?

No mention of the 5 more TD in 10 less games I see, also you said anybody not just CK. I would take CK, Hoying, Schlichter or Germaine over RP any day of the week. But back to what started this whole train wreck...

Comparing MoC and RP as busts of equal magnitude is just not even close.

-RP came into college with Heisman hype, had 4 years and never even came close.

-MoC came into college with big (although no one was calling him a Heisman contender untill he started to actually put up the numbers) hype, produced at a heisman winning level for one year and then blew his career.

There is no doubt MoC had the talent to win one (or more), he lacked the brain/charachter. RP lacked the talent. If I had to pick one to be an alumnus and ambassador for my school I'd pick RP all day long, but that wasn't the context of the comparison you put forth.