| Buckeye Football Ohio State football, moderated. Consider this the general community forum, but with a theme. Completely off-topic chatter should start at, or move to, the Open Discussion forum. |
08-15-2005, 12:58 PM
|
 |
Big Ben
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,063
Points: 929,778.15
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 929,778.15
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by gregorylee
So how long did he get tossed for?
|
i think grad said 3 days
__________________
|
08-15-2005, 01:32 PM
|
 |
blissfully stupid
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,969
Points: 1,507,126.65
Bank: 1,477.25
Total Points: 1,508,603.90
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lvbuckeye
except for your starting RB, who will be replacing an 1,800 yard rusher who owns the sixth highest rushing total in CFB history...
except for your WR crew, which have a combined ZERO TD catches...
except for your MLB, who will be replacing an AA and Butkus winner...
except for your placekicker whom i do not think has even attempted a collegiate FG...
why did i even bother responding...?
|
roflmao!! to save me the time in typing all that?
but back on topic, whatever are you thinking? each of those guys are polished and good to go! they play for texas!  |
08-15-2005, 02:14 PM
|
 |
Illuminatus Primus
Administrator
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,780
Points: 495,038,266.32
Bank: 60,571.81
Total Points: 495,098,838.13
|
|
No serious football fans question the OUS's NC's from 1942, 1954, 1957, 1968, and 2002; 1961 is a bit weaker, but still legit, IMO. I have never considered the 1970 NC to be legit, since the poll was before the bowl games (and OSU's ridiculous loss to Stanford in the Rose). However, the 1944 team (undefeated, untied) deserves more NC recognition. So, seven titles sounds about right. |
08-15-2005, 02:21 PM
|
 |
Are you in the Tribe?
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,965
Points: 80,200,071.68
Bank: 345,407.36
Total Points: 80,545,479.04
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LordJeffBuck
No serious football fans question the OUS's NC's from 1942, 1954, 1957, 1968, and 2002; 1961 is a bit weaker, but still legit, IMO. I have never considered the 1970 NC to be legit, since the poll was before the bowl games (and OSU's ridiculous loss to Stanford in the Rose). However, the 1944 team (undefeated, untied) deserves more NC recognition. So, seven titles sounds about right. |
It better be 7 cause I bought one of those pennant flags from the buckeye hall of fame and it says 7 I really hope I didn't get ripped off..  (unless it should be 8)
__________________
There are three types of people in this world. Those who can count, and those who can't!!
|
08-15-2005, 02:56 PM
|
|
Senior
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 176
Points: 3,666.29
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 3,666.29
|
|
umm osu has a better history than ut- more national titles, heisman winners, u name it. imo we're on the same level as nebraska, miami, michigan and slightly below ND, SC, oklahoma, and bama, with texas in the next tier w/ teams like penn st. |
08-15-2005, 03:38 PM
|
 |
Watson, Crick & A Twist
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,391
Points: 1,457,655.81
Bank: 0.28
Total Points: 1,457,656.10
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by gregorylee
So how long did he get tossed for?
|
About Seven Yards
__________________
"They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it is not half so bad as a lot of ignorance." - Terry Pratchett
|
08-15-2005, 03:45 PM
|
 |
Haole in da hills
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 21,319
Points: 48,432,192.43
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 48,432,192.43
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by OSU Rob
umm osu has a better history than ut- more national titles, heisman winners, u name it. imo we're on the same level as nebraska, miami, michigan and slightly below ND, SC, oklahoma, and bama, with texas in the next tier w/ teams like penn st. |
Actually, Texas has the same all-time winning percentage as us (.709) and has 21 more wins. I'd say that puts them on our level.
Also, we are not below USC all-time (we're 5th in both wins and percentage, and they're 10th in wins and 9th in percentage).
__________________
|
08-15-2005, 04:31 PM
|
 |
I'd rather be napping!!
|
|
| |
