![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Buckeye Football Ohio State football, moderated. Consider this the general community forum, but with a theme. Completely off-topic chatter should start at, or move to, the Open Discussion forum. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||||||||
|
Eric Kasilious saying USC's schedule is soft
and he invites calls from USC fans to support that USC has a decent schedule. Guy calls in and says USC's big game is "Arizona State" .... amusing.
Then, after Kaslious blasts that remark, the dude says "Well what about Weiss at ND." Eric correclty notes that as good a Coach as CW may end up being they have no talent. |
| Sponsored Links |
|
|||||||||
|
ALthough he also did just say Michigan is "loaded"
Guess he's not considering Defense. |
|
|||||||||
|
He thinks Texas is slightly ahead of OSU in terms of talent, and has Purdue as the likely pick from the Big Ten because they don't have to play OSU or Mich. Says no one will be surprised if OSU is in the title game, but believes Purdont is in the drivers seat owning to the schedule and he thinks OSU is more prone to "Stub their toe" against Texas, Iowa, or Michigan.
|
|
|||||||||
|
Kasilious is on and off. one minute i'm agreeing with him 100%, the next he is talking about how tom brady is the next joe montana.
I got to listen to Cowherd today and was disappointed to hear him talking about LLWS and how wrong it is to put on TV. I agree with him (like always), but I wanted to hear him blast Texas some more. Quote:
|
|
|||||||||
|
Yeah, I didn't find anyting he said wholly objectionable. I disagree with his assesment of Tex being slightly more talented, though I'm probably splitting hairs.
Cowherd would blast his arguement (save for the USC soft schedule stuff - but Colin would point out the Big XII is as, if not MORE, soft than the Pac 10) |
|
|||||||||
|
A couple points:
1. USC is the best team in the country. They would and should be favored over anyone that they play. I haven't heard anyone in the media claim they have a killer schedule...just that the Trojans are the best in the country. Hard to argue. 2. USC's schedule is filled with land mines...but not a single true battle. All they have to navigate the land without tripping and they are safe. They will beat themselves if they lose before January. 3. Here is a list of teams that would be favored in every game with the exact same schedule as SC: LSU, Tennessee, Texas, tOSU, Miami, Michigan, Va Tech, Oklahoma, Iowa, Florida, Georgia. We are outraged by Purdue's schedule, but I challenge anyone to show me how it's that much easier than USC's. 2005 Trojan Schedule at Hawaii Arkansas at Oregon at Arizona State Arizona at Notre Dame at Washington Washington State Stanford at California Fresno State UCLA |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
The reason we are outraged with Purdon't sched is because they miss the 2 best teams in conference (obviously). To compare that outrage to whatever you feel when you see USC's sched is a little unfair because they just have a cake sched. Purdue's isn't cake in and of itself......it's cake because every Big10 team should play either mich or Ohio State every single year. |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
I tell you what if there is ever another year like last year where a hell of team in AU goes undefeated and does not play for the NC that is just bull[censored]. Ok know I am off my rant. |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Arizona St. < Iowa Cal < Purdue Oregon State < Minnesota Oregon < Penn State UCLA > Wisconsin Arizona = Michigan State Washington State = Northwestern Stanford > Illinois Washington > Indiana |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|