| Buckeye Football Ohio State football, moderated. Consider this the general community forum, but with a theme. Completely off-topic chatter should start at, or move to, the Open Discussion forum. |
10-08-2005, 11:40 PM
|
 |
Legend
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,472
Points: 0.15
Bank: 0.51
Total Points: 0.66
|
|
|
Krenzel wasn't just a quarterback, he was a leader. Which is also something this offense is in a desperate need of.
|
10-08-2005, 11:42 PM
|
 |
Senior
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 211
Points: 1,096.51
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 1,096.51
|
|
|
We have three QBs sitting on the bench. One of them has no experience, one has minimal experience and the other should be starting right now. Maybe one of them has leadership skills, but we can't find out because JT insists on playing Jacks...Beliss...Smith.
|
10-08-2005, 11:54 PM
|
 |
I am Nate and I approved this message.
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 145
Points: 1,647.57
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 1,647.57
|
|
|
Jackson was during the Cooper era. Belissari was the best QB we had at the time and it was JT's first year. The team responds better to Smith. Zwick, IMO, may be the better QB but you can't make the argument that this team would have a better record with Zwick manning the QB position. Also, TB is to young to be thrown into the fire just yet.
There were people bitching and whining to bring in McMullen over Krenzel just because Krenzel wasn't lighting it up. That goes with the territory, people have their own opinions.
My reason for this thread wasn't to bash any of the current players, coaches or anyone else. I just truly realized how unappreciative people were of Krenzel.
|
10-09-2005, 12:15 AM
|
 |
Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica.
Moderator
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,136
Points: 2,727,116.77
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 2,727,116.77
|
|
|
I don't necessarily support switching QBs, but am I the only one who thinks the whole "team responds better to Smith" thing is bull[censored] and a lame excuse?
__________________
Ohio State versus M*ch*g*n trumps everything. It trumps your record. It trumps whether it's dangerous or you don't have a chance or any of those kinds of things. It trumps all things because it's the Ohio State-M*ch*g*n game. And I would like to think our guys understand that, but there's only one demonstration of understanding that and that's at 12:00 noon on Saturday.
1942 1954 1957 1961 1968 1970 2002...
|
10-09-2005, 12:32 AM
|
 |
if I don't take us down the field, bench me
Senior Moderator
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 22,526
Points: 87,591,852.49
Bank: 0.04
Total Points: 87,591,852.53
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jlb1705
I don't necessarily support switching QBs, but am I the only one who thinks the whole "team responds better to Smith" thing is bull[censored] and a lame excuse?
|
people from this site have spent a day with Justin Zwick and afterwards realized why everyone likes Smith better.
Krenzel wouldn't have done jack if the line broke down 20+ times a day like today.
__________________
|
10-09-2005, 12:34 AM
|
 |
Thoughts Arrive Like Butterflies
Administrator
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 7,854
Points: 16,741,499.57
Bank: 250,250.12
Total Points: 16,991,749.69
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jlb1705
I don't necessarily support switching QBs, but am I the only one who thinks the whole "team responds better to Smith" thing is bull[censored] and a lame excuse?
|
Nope.
__________________
Anonymous Donor
|
10-09-2005, 12:35 AM
|
|
Senior
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 211
Points: 1,096.51
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 1,096.51
|
|
Quote:
|
but am I the only one who thinks the whole "team responds better to Smith" thing is bull[censored] and a lame excuse?
|
No, you're not the only one. I completely concur. If you think it's bad here, check out Bucknuts.
"Responds better", "Sparks the team", etc.... That's always the response to Smith's crap play. <!-- / message --><!-- sig --> |
10-09-2005, 12:39 AM
|
 |
Haole in da hills
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 21,717
Points: 83,860,374.40
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 83,860,374.40
| | |
