![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Buckeye Football Ohio State football, moderated. Consider this the general community forum, but with a theme. Completely off-topic chatter should start at, or move to, the Open Discussion forum. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack (4) | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
| Sponsored Links |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Nice. |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
ahh...I am just messing w/ you TB. Good call by you on all accts. Now where's that cookie recipe that was in Garrett Goebel's thread? Stoney would have to fill out a ton to be a Big 10 TE. |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
. Honestly, filling out is the easy part. The tough part is having a kid play on the line when he has never done that before. |
|
|||||||||
|
This is one big, tall kid I don't see becoming a TE!
I see a 230lb, 6-5 WR that is a match up nightmare! |
|
|||||||||
|
It seems Soneburner can create the match up problems that Josh Chichester could have done here. Are these similar types of receivers, or is the only thing they have in common is that they're taller than the average wideout?
|
|
|||||||||
|
Similar but don't get it twisted...Stoney has freakish athleticism and speed for his size. Chichester is all arms and legs and will rely on his size fo get open. Chichester is much taller and not nearly as fast (Chichester is around 6-8 and runs around a 4.7...Stoney is almost 6-5 and ran a 4.46). Their frames are much different.
|
|
|||||||||
|
It's going to be a blast watching Stoneburner in S&G. I think that he is going to become a very quick fan favorite.
![]() |
|
||||||||
|
Chichester was lanky and lean. Stoneburner is more muscular. I'd guess that right now, even after going to prep school, that Stoneburner weighs more than Chichester.
|
|
|||||||||
|
Chichester is actually a touch heavier than Stoneburner if you compare the two right now...Josh has put on almost 20 pounds since leaving high school and is up to around 230. Stoney is listed at around 225 right now.
|
|
||||||||
|
Quote:
Jake will probably be up to 240 though by the end of his freshman year I imagine(it seems every freshman gain at least 10-15 pounds). Still though, that's 230 over a 6'8" frame compared to 225 over a 6'5" frame. |
|
|||||||||
|
agreed...and .25 seconds faster in the 40...
|
![]() |
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.buckeyeplanet.com/forum/buckeye-football/27882-te-wr-jake-stoneburner-official-thread.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| '08 OH WR Jake Stoneburner (Ohio State Signee) - Recruiting Forums | This thread | Refback | 08-03-2008 10:49 PM | |
| SPARQ | SPARQ Training | Post #0 | Refback | 04-01-2008 01:13 PM | |
| YouTube - Dublin Coffman vs Canton McKinley Football Scrimmage | This thread | Refback | 08-22-2007 09:59 PM | |
| '08 OH WR Jake Stoneburner (Ohio State Verbal) - Recruiting Forums | This thread | Refback | 07-07-2007 04:01 AM | |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|