| Buckeye Football Ohio State football, moderated. Consider this the general community forum, but with a theme. Completely off-topic chatter should start at, or move to, the Open Discussion forum. |

01-19-2008, 11:01 AM
|
 |
Just beat scUM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,140
Points: 24,852,156.42
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 24,852,156.42
|
|
|
Big Ten and the Spread offense
We've all heard it a million times already, Dick Wadriguez is going to bring the B10 into the 21st century with his spread offense(funny how the media considers it chic when its really just a combination of the old single wing and triple option).
I even recall a derisive line from Kieth Jackson during the Fiesta Bowl when CK took a direct snap and plowed straight ahead...Jackson said "Its like single wing football" and he wasn't trying to be flattering. At that time the media experts considered Miami's pro-style offense "modern" football.
Fast foreward to 2008 and the experts have changed their tune, the pro style stuff is blase, snapping directly to the QB in the shotgun and having him run or hand off to the back is "modern" football.
So anyway after watching PSU's backup QB in the Alamo I got to thinking about how many schools run the spread in the B10. I would have been better off listing the schools that don't/won't run it. I listed in by types of spread and made the assumption on PSU based on what I saw in the Alamo.
Pure zone read option teams
scUM
Illinois
PSU
Indiana
Run first spread
Northwestern
MSU(TBD with Dantonio once he gets it built his way)
Pass happy dink and dunk spread
Purdue
Minny
Pro style or teams that still have full backs
OSU
Wisky
Iowa(they don't really have an offense but from what little I saw)
Iowa is a team I'm not sure where to put, much like MSU. I think with the talent issues he has KF is more likely to end up a spread to run team and MSU is more likely to go back to Pro Style once Dantonio gets the roster made over from the spread days of JLS.
So when you really look at it only 2-3 teams in the B10 don't run the spread as their base offense. Just one more thing to keep in mind when you hear the chimps in the media running their necks.
__________________
OSU under Jim Tressel83-19 (.814%)1 National Championship3 NC appearances 5 B10 Championships(4 consecutive)7-1 vs scUM6 BCS Bowl Appearances1 Heisman TrophyB10 record 20 game conference win streak
|

01-19-2008, 12:46 PM
|
|
Heisman
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 686
Points: 503,716.93
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 503,716.93
|
|
|
So very true. Randy Walker came in at NorthWestern and drove us nuts with his "Spread" back in starting with 2001 season. The spread is very puzzleling offense and you must have all the right pieces of fit. One of the media people here in J-ville is hounding me to death on the ventures of DickWad and how are days are over with beating Michigan. Thats when I blew up at him and really started me going and getting ready for the N/C game. I was
just so charged up for that and I wanted a win so badly.
__________________
"Anything easy.....ain't worth a damn."
|

01-19-2008, 01:04 PM
|
 |
/"\ Gig 'em Bucks /"\
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,522
Points: 2,605,120.97
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 2,605,120.97
|
|
|
Is it safe to say that teams run this style of offense bc its easier?? (see the direction of a lot of high schools), or because of personnel? From my humble observations, I always thought teams play this way bc they have a few good players and kinda try to catch the other team off balance. Thoughts............
__________________
"There are two kinds of people in this world that go around beardless ? boys and women ? and I am neither one." -Greek saying
"A woman with a beard looks like a man. A man without a beard looks like a woman." - Afghan Saying
In the course of history, men with facial hair have been ascribed various attributes such as wisdom and knowledge, sexual virility, or high social status; and, conversely, filthiness, crudeness, or an eccentric disposition.
|

01-19-2008, 01:05 PM
|
 |
Set TP Free
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 15,786
Points: 51,828.92
Bank: 10,683.12
Total Points: 62,512.04
|
|
Teams that run versions of the spread/read option have given us headaches. 2005 Penn State 2007 Illinois.
We STILL haven't learned to consistently stop it. That's why people try to run it against us.
That's why Big Ten teams want to run it. They have seen it work when they had the athletes to run it well.
Eventually, we should get better at defending it. One hopes.
But, there will be games where we will just have to out score teams.
__________________
I am a firm believer in the people. If given the truth, they can be depended upon to meet any national crisis.
Abraham Lincoln
|

01-19-2008, 01:05 PM
|
 |
Hall of Fame
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,063
Points: 563.34
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 563.34
|
|
|
Nice thread Jax
I was just thinking about the indefensible spread offense and wondered about next years early season rankings and which of those teams run predominantly spread offenses.
tOSU - multiple formation pro style
UGa -ditto
OU - ditto
UF - definate spread, but if they had quality RB's they would probably be a little less spread and a little more power
USC - multiple formation, pro style
LSU - ditto
Wisky - smashmouth I
Now a lot of teams do run the spread, but it appears to me that if it was the do-all end-all, then the premiere programs in the country would all be jumping on board.
It will be interesting to see when rr does have elite athletes whose strength is running the spread, if tOSU and others in the B10 will have to go with slightly smaller LB's who move a little better (ala Woody, making safeties into LBs and big LBs into DE's, etc)
I still think that the spread allows teams to compete against superiorly talented teams, but it has many many limitations. Hopefully we'll see some of them next year when rr's scUM plays in foul midwest weather and is laying the pigskin on the turf 5-6 times a game.
__________________
If being a Buckeye fan is wrong, I don't wanna be right
|

01-19-2008, 01:08 PM
|
|
A scarlet and grey blooded lady
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 530
Points: 132.60
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 132.60
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrizzlyBuck
Nice thread Jax
I was just thinking about the indefensible spread offense and wondered about next years early season rankings and which of those teams run predominantly spread offenses.
.
|
Great thread Jaxbuck.
It's not indefensable to pitt. 
__________________
OH MY !
|

01-19-2008, 01:15 PM
|
 |
Hall of Fame
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,063
Points: 563.34
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 563.34
|
|
After seeing some of the replies, I thought I'd give a few more cents worth
I think rr and the Illini's version of the spread is very, very dangerous IF the QB can do more than run. If the QB completes enough passes to keep defenses honest, then it keeps running lanes open. Juice had an outstanding game against the Buckeyes, not so much agains USC. Pat White is not a very adept passer, so when WVU ran up against an athletically equivalent team, they lost, because he was unable to keep the defenses honest.
The spread is a great equalizer, if the QB can pass AND if he can stay healthy through all the punishment he incurs. That may be why the premiere programs do not run it (also why the NFL O-Coords treat it like the plague) I would think you need at least two QBs adept at running it because over the length of a season it takes luck to stay healthy, just ask Tebow about his shoulder and Pat White about his entire body, Juice got dinged up as well, just not against tOSU 
__________________
If being a Buckeye fan is wrong, I don't wanna be right
|

01-19-2008, 01:47 PM
|
 |
Just beat scUM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,140
Points: 24,852,156.42
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 24,852,156.42
|
|
|
To me the limitations/benefits of the spread are the same as the triple option teams ran as recently as the 80's.
Pro's
very hard to prepare for, places a lot of stress on the defense and keeps them from being able to "cheat" ie makes them defend everything. IN THEORY if the passing option(of run, pitch, pass) were as fully effective as the other two it would be an amlost indefensible attack.
Con's
this is where theory sperates from reality. In theory everyone would be good at everything. All coaches know that defense and special teams are just as important as offense to winning so why are teams so commonly outstanding in one area and deficient in others?
The answer is time constraints and priorities. There are only so many practice hours, you have to focus on something and its always to the detriment of another thing. The zone read version of the spread is just as much a run first offense as the triple option was and because of that the passing part of it suffers from the priority issue. Option run games require tons of reps in practice...tons.
Why did all the option attacks of the 70's and 80's never produce a great NFL passing QB? Were the players any less athletic? Maybe to a small degree. Were the coaches less sophisticated? Hardly. They knew then just as they know now if they could pass well out of the triple option the defense wouldn't stand a chance.
Its the same now as it was then. Option QB's take too much physical pounding and have to spend too much time practicing the run part of the option to be great passers. Now people will bring up Tebow and I say he's the exception more so than the rule but you saw in the Bowl game how pedestrian of a passing attack they had when the run option was eliminated.
To me the pro style multiple formation system is always the best if you have year in and year out superior athletes. Its built to do everything out of one offense. A power run game sets up the play action pass game and you can do it out of the same sets and even off of the same plays. One year it can be more pass oriented and others it can be more run oriented without changing who you are fundamentally.
My perfect system would have a legit pass first threat QB thats highly mobile with a power run game behind him. To me thats the indefensible offense ie the 1994 49ers with Steve Young and Ricky Watters.
It defeats everything a defense tries to do to dictate to an offense. You can't say we'll take away the run and make the QB beat us, he'll freakin shred you. You can't say we'll pressure the QB and make him get rid of it, he's mobile, he'll get outside and make huge plays. You can't sit in the nickel and drop 8 all day long to take away the p | |