![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Buckeye Football Ohio State football, moderated. Consider this the general community forum, but with a theme. Completely off-topic chatter should start at, or move to, the Open Discussion forum. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Sponsored Links |
|
|||||||||
|
For the less technical among us... what exactly is "the pistol"? My understanding is it's the shotgun with the RB lined up behind the QB instead of to the side. I've heard this was good for a small fast RB although I'm not sure exactly why. Also, if it lends itself to the option, I'm not sure it works well with Beanie in the game. I'm curious what some of the more "in the know" posters have to say about this.
|
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
It gets the quarterback out from under center which would give him more time to throw, as well as puts the running back in the backfield where he would be in a normal formation which lets him get a running start downhill like he would if the QB was under center. |
|
|||||||||
|
As I understand it, the pistol is a hybrid of a single back/QB under center, and a shotgun. The QB is closer to the center than in the shotgun (~3yds), and the TB is about the same distance as his place in an I-form. The advantages are: it eliminates some of the footwork from the QB; allows for quick passes; allows the RB to get a couple steps momentum before the handoff. I doubt it will replace either of the classic formations, but it looks like it's going to be popular for HS teams. When I saw Moeller vs. Princeton (Cincy) this year, they both ran the pistol exclusively. I don't think the size of the RB really matters. I guess on a basic level, it gets the ball to the QB right at the spot he would turn to make a handoff, but without the worry of footwork, and a little quicker.
|
|
||||||||
|
Missouri 69 - 17 Nevada
ESPN - Daniel sets Missouri's career passing record in rout - NCAA College Football Recap Proof that system is secondary to talent. Not saying it can't work, merely that the problem at Ohio State runs deeper than operating from a somewhat traditional offense. Having a pistol formation or package will add versatility, but it is no panacea. |
|
|||||||||
|
From: Pistol Offense - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Quote:
|
|
|||||||||
|
Pistol-Spread-Jet-Wing-T-Pro-Split Back Veer-One Back-No Back
It is all in what you can teach, what they can execute, what fits your talent best, and throw in who blocks and tackles better.
Call it what you will, but HUGE-Athletic-Football Smart-Good Character X beats little-slow-unorganized O every time. Pistol and the spread are very similar in philosophy. Some say the pistol is more efficient in the running game, but again its what you can teach and what they can do. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|