![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Buckeye Football Ohio State football, moderated. Consider this the general community forum, but with a theme. Completely off-topic chatter should start at, or move to, the Open Discussion forum. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||||||||
| Sponsored Links |
|
|||||||||
|
http://www.bucknuts.com/blog/post-detail.php?p=5744 2-4-09
Bollman On The Future Of OSU's O-Line Quote:
|
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Maybe Oller did a mini Rip Van Winkle and fell asleep for a few years and missed Brewster, Adams and Shugarts last year being very highly regarded as well as Mewort and Hall this year. Typical Dispatch writing, if you can't say something negative, don't say anything at all, and we'll just print one of the other reporters negative stuff I know they aren't really that bad, but sometimes you wonder where in the [censored] they're coming from. |
|
|||||||||
|
Ohio State football: Questions on the offensive line - Ohio State Buckeyes Football & Basketball Blog (OSU) - cleveland.com
Quote:
|
|
|||||||||
|
I don't know about the rest of you, but I thought coming in, the 2008 (the year we just finished) O-line was hyped to be pretty darn powerful. With the amount of size, weight, and # of years under their belts, they were projected to 'get' it. However, looking in the rearview mirror on the season, it appears that they were, 'inconsistent', 'soft', and allowed way too many sacks, forces, tackles-in-the-backfields, etc. Hard to say, when the feature back went for over a grand, and the back up about half that.......
Soooo, the conclusion is not the amount of stars that they bring in, but how they perform on the field. Should our O-line be rated highly? I would say so, based on what I've seen. If a true frosh plays, but gets beaten by the DE consistently, should they get pulled for someone less talented, but more savvy? That's why the coaches get paid so much. I was surprised when Rehring and Boone were split up, but that was an experience thing on the right side (I guess?), and Person went down. I continue to echo that the O-line (and D-line) dictates what we can and cannot do on Offense (and defense). OSU gets good-to-great HSers to come here, or some of the middle-of-the-road guys that the staff feels like they can 'coach up' into superstar behemoths (or working man types who bring their lunch pail to work and just get the job done). Nonetheless, on paper <= sarcasm font, it looks like the Buckeyes have the makings of a very, very good O-line. I hope these guys reveal a nasty attitude, and are successful in starting each and every play on a positive note. Not even a Pryor can create if he is running for his life, and/or the D is neck and neck with the snap in getting to him. Sorry for the rant. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|||||||||
|
Part II and III of the PD's look at the oline...
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|||||||||
|
There has been a good deal of discussion in other threads about whether the 09 OL will be better or worse than they were in 08. Will better athletes ====== better performance, or will less experience spell trouble?
As always, mark me down as an optimist. One of the things that I posted frequently during mid-season was how much I over-valued experience going into last season. As some have observed elsewhere, the lack of experience did not prevent USC's OL from being very good last year. Considering the star rating of the prospective starters, I contend we can expect as much. Further, consider the importance of an OL's ability to work together; then consider the comaraderie these guys have already developed. Most of this line has been called the Brew Crew since before they even signed their LOIs. How well the other guys mesh with the Brew Crew will go a long way in determining how the 09 offense does. As young as they are, this is the most talented OL of the Tressel era by a large margin. Despite their lack of experience, I think they have a chance to be the best of the Tressel era. ...until 2010 anyway. |
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
It'll be great to see the Brew Crew as one unit.
|
|
|||||||||
|
I think Shugarts will get more PT against USC than Browning will.
|
|
|||||||||
|
I'd almost prefer to have Boren at RT than Browning
(as crazy as that may sound) Not a knock on Browning, but he got smoked last year - a lot. |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||||||||
|
See, Browning gets something of a bum rap. He wasn't nearly as bad as many people make him out to be. He had some bad games, as did everybody on the line, but there were a number of games, IIRC, that he graded out much higher than you'd expect.
The whole line was a fiasco last season due to injuries and people shuffling positions. Not to mention adapting to a true frosh center (though Brew improved tremendously as the season went on). I'm really excited about the versatility Mewhort brings and Hall should be in the mix immediately. Provided Browning wins a starting spot, having Mewhort, Hall, Moses, Miller and Shugarts rotating in is just ridiculous depth. If Conner Smith can finally put it together, I think the depth is unmatched acrost the country. If people can stay healthy and a true, consistent rotation is found, it should be night and day this year from last. This is the most talent I've seen on a Buckeye line that I can remember. Just hope health allows the production to match it. This might be the unit I'm most excited about heading into '09. Last edited by NFBuck; 03-29-2009 at 01:05 PM. |
|
|||||||||
|
Count me as an optimist heading into the season here as well. Sure we had experience in the last group but I just don't really think the talent was there. Boone was a talent but the effort was in question sometimes, Rehring and Person were getting blown up (even against Ohio U), and Browning was pretty inconsistent. Cordle was one of the few consistent players imo. Brewster played really well I thought, especially for a freshman. Shugarts would have likely taken over the right tackle if he hadn't got injured and I've always thought he was the most college ready coming out of HS. His technique was as good as you could hope for coming out of HS and he is a monster...I expect big things from him this year. Adams of course is just an athletic specimen and if he lives up to half of his potential, he will be spectacular. Boren seems to be a pretty safe bet considering he had proven himself as a freshman on scUM's OL.
I really am excited about this group and I think the athleticism of the group will translate well to the skill players we have. Not to mention I like the depth and experience that Kerr, Miller, Smith, Blankenship, etc. provide. Even with the depth I think there is room for one freshman to make an impact in the rotation. |
|
||||||||
|
I agree that Browning is playing out of position; but when we are short on Tackles you have to step up.
It was interesting because he had a lot of trouble against PSU. I mean he really couldn't get out of his stance a lot to kick out when they were taking him outside. However, he actually played well against Orakpo in the Texas game and that guy was an AA. Thankfully we have more athletic bodies that can compete outside....Miller, Shugarts, perhaps Mewort and maybe Hall. Either way it is nice to have some competition at the tackle spots for a change. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|