![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Buckeye Football Ohio State football, moderated. Consider this the general community forum, but with a theme. Completely off-topic chatter should start at, or move to, the Open Discussion forum. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Will it be 100% exact cause and effect? No but if there is indeed a larger number of DL in the NFL from southern states than northern ones then you at least have to start asking questions as to why that is. I can tell you already from no farther than I have gotten through the NFL website that CA will throw a major monkey wrench into the theory. They produce an ass load of DL talent so far and it results in a suprising number of Pac10 DL's in the NFL. Also I am starting to believe the B10 schools might have issues either identifying some of these kids during recruiting or getting them into school because many of the players who are from the north aren't going to traditional big time schools. |
| Sponsored Links |
|
|||||||||
|
I know this is from left field, but the small fast guys will be small and fast no matter where they grow up. Maybe the big guys in the south are always out running around, because of the weather, and not so much in the north, because of the rotten, stinking, lousy, useless, depressing snow. Well at least I got that off my chest
![]() |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
For reasons known but to God, DL are notoriously poor performers on the wunderlicht(sp?) test. DL are also notoriously poor performers in the classroom; whether it be in high school, at ACT tests, or in college. Yet another stat that leave us scratching our heads, as OL are typically the best academic performers and test takers. Looking at Jax's data on players east of the Mississippi, it is clear that most of them are from South of the Mason-Dixon. Again, for reasons that are a mystery to me, there are so few who are academically fit to go to Big Ten schools (or Georgia Tech), there are practically none left after the University of Florida has taken their share. This isn't to say that Big Ten schools won't take a chance on a can't-miss 5-star DT (Chuck Jones anyone?); but for the 4-star and below DLs, less academically demanding schools are often the only option. . . . As for why so many DL come from South of the Mason-Dixon: I truly believe that it does have a lot to do with the weather. I have heard the arguments that kids in the north are in the gym during foul-weather, so they're running around too; but I think I'm torturing the language to call that an "argument". The difference is not made when a kid is in high-school, or even junior high. The difference is made during the formative years. All of those lost opportunities to go out and run around for a few minutes here and there throughout the day... that adds up. During the years when the body is laying the foundation on which puberty will build a man, development during those years makes an enormous difference. For another example of this phenomenon at work you can look north, rather than south. In the youth hockey leagues in Canada and Czecholovakia(sp?), they use January as the cut-off for the 6-year-old age limit. Studies point to this as the sole-reason why, in both countries, a vast majority of all-star hockey players are born in the first 3 months of the year. These kids are just a few months older than the others; but that's enough that they get more playing time as pre-pubescent skaters. By the time puberty rolls around, natural talent is swamped by experience and the pre-development of the frame. |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Buckskin86; 04-08-2009 at 08:32 AM. |
|
|||||||||
|
Man I hope that's a prediction that comes true. The D line has, frankly, been a liability at times. They started to look better by the end of last year, but it would be great to get a whole season of solid play from that unit.
|
|
|||||||||
|
Coach Heacock talks about previous D-lines at tOSU and the potential for this year's line.
Official.site.video |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Buckskin86; 04-29-2009 at 04:37 PM. |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Wonder what the posters here think? I personally agree with o-zone, since some of our d-ends are so versatile and I trust them to stand up. |
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
additionally, the ozone article that you mentioned points out quite correctly that 3-4 defensive ends need to be bigger and stronger, basically just glorified defensive tackles who take up blockers, which mitigates the strengths of some of our best players along the defensive line (Nathan Williams, Thaddeus Gibson, possibly Solomon Thomas ect.) so while dreaming of 3-4 defenses with linebackers running wild might be fun during the offseason, #1 I don't think it's going to happen and #2 if it does happen I think it will be a mistake (except possibly in very specific circumstances and against teams that can't match up talent wise against us... so basically everyone except USC and Penn State) |
|
|||||||||
|
That is true, but keep in mind Doug Worthington as well as Cam Heyward are both prototype 3-4 ends in terms of size and ability.
Sliding worthington down to the end, with gibson as the rush linebacker would actually make a lot of sense as Gibson knows how to play linebacker. If anything I'd say the weakness in trying to run a 3-4 would be we dont have an "ideal" nose tackle at all. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|