![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Buckeye Football Ohio State football, moderated. Consider this the general community forum, but with a theme. Completely off-topic chatter should start at, or move to, the Open Discussion forum. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||||||
|
I think that one of the great things we hear about Tress is that he treats the
players like they are his own children. They are given a second chance, and they are looked after and taught social and community values. On the other hand, the children need to respect that they are a part of the family, and what they do reflects on the family. A friend of mine, recently had to set down his child and say, "Look, you are young and you are your own person, but what you do drags the family through the mud with you. This is not OK." My point is that while Tress accepts them as family, and is willing to give them a second chance, he also needs to teach them that are are consequences to actions, and just because you are a football player, you cannot get away with murder (ok, so OJ is the exception ... but I think he was Petey's #1 guy) You cannot keep letting them do these things with just a slap on the wrist. This comes back to the fact that Ohio Players with the Lenix attitude that it is an honor to represent your state are guys that we want to be here. The point here is that while Tress is great at giving the kids a second chance, I think he needs to emphasize to them a little more how their actions reflect on the family. I think that while the Smith incident is a "minor" infraction, it is a major black eye to the family, at a time when the family was under close scrutiney / attack for this very thing. SO while the technical infraction is minor, there is a major lack of judgment in terms of being a productive member of the tOSU family, and there needs to be sincere remorse on Smith's part when he is back to being a member of this family. The consequences of the actions are far more reaching than just missing a Bowl game performance from a player, and the penalty should be more than just that Smith didn't get to have fun in San Antonio, so that is appropriate punishment to excuse the loss of a second game. What should that punishment be ..... hey I just propose the proposition .... JT needs to answer that question. I just want to emphasize that we all represent tOSU. And all of our actions reflect upon the university, and other tOSU members. Some more so than others. Whith great priviledges comes great responsability. |
| Sponsored Links |
|
|||||||||
|
Great job TI
|
|
|||||||||
|
I agree, TI.
Asking the NCAA to reinstate Troy before the first game of the year, which they have the option to do, would be a mistake. Both in terms of the message to the players and the PR aspect nationally. But I think that Tress often takes away priveleges from players for minor discretions that aren't publicized. I don't think that very many players on the team think that they can get away with much. Unfortunately, at this point it only takes 1 to get the program raked through the mud again. |
|
|||||||||
|
Fantastic post TI, you stole most of my thoughts on this issue.
![]() |
|
|||||||||
|
trss. and fam
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|